A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT DOSES OF INTRATHECAL 1% 2-CHLOROPROCAINE WITH FENTANYL AS ADJUVANT FOR INFRUMBILICAL SURGERIES
Main Article Content
Keywords
Anaesthetics, 2-chloroprocaine, Fentanyl, Neuraxial Blocks, Regional Anaesthesia, Spinal Anaesthesia
Abstract
Background: Intrathecal anesthesia is crucial for surgical procedures, providing effective analgesia and muscle relaxation. Among these agents, 2-chloroprocaine has gained popularity due to its rapid onset and shorter duration. This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two doses (40 mg and 50 mg) of 2-chloroprocaine in terms of analgesia, onset, duration, and anesthesia quality. Secondary objectives include investigating side effects associated with fentanyl and chloroprocaine use.
Methods: This study was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Government Medical College, Jammu, over a period of one year from November 2017 to October 2018. The enrolled patients were divided into two equal groups, with 30 patients in each group: Group A received intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine (40 mg) with fentanyl (20 μg), while Group B received intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine (50 mg) with fentanyl (20 μg).
Results: Group B demonstrated a significantly earlier onset of sensory and motor block compared to Group A (p-value<0.001*). The time for two segmental regression of sensory block and the duration of sensory block were also significantly longer in Group B (p-value <0.001*). Furthermore, patients in Group B took a longer time to reach a modified Bromage scale of 0 for motor block. Both groups experienced bradyarrhythmias, hypotension, and nausea, but the differences were not statistically significant. Itching was observed in patients from both groups. However, there were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation) between the two groups.
Conclusion: The amalgamation of intrathecal 1% 2-Chloroprocaine at a dose of 50mg alongside fentanyl at 20μg emerges as a compelling and captivating alternative in the realm of infraumbilical surgical interventions, surpassing the potency of chloroprocaine at 40 mg combined with fentanyl at 20μg.
References
2. Singariya G, Choudhary K, Kamal M, Bihani P, Pahuja H, Saini P. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine with or without fentanyl in elective caesarean section: A prospective, double-blind, randomised study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;65(2):102-107. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_816_20. Epub 2021 Feb 10. PMID: 33776083; PMCID: PMC7983823.
3. Hindle A. Intrathecal opioids in the management of acute postoperative pain. ContinuEducAnaesthCrit Care Pain 2008;8:81-5. doi: 10.1093/ bjaceaccp/mkn016
4. Vath JS, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-Chloroprocaine: The effect of added Fentanyl. AnesthAnalg. 2004;98:89–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Uppal V, Retter S, Casey M, Sancheti S, Matheson K, McKeen DM. Efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl for cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. AnesthAnalg. 2020;130:111–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Champagne K, Fecek C, Goldstein S. Spinal Opioids in Anesthetic Practice. [Updated 2023 Apr 2]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564409/
7. Patel, A., Gajjar, V. A., Shah, V. A., Jain, S., Tharadara, M., Chaya, S., &Purohit, V. (2023). A Randomized Comparative Study of Different Doses of Chloroprocaine for Spinal Anaesthesia. International Journal of Toxicological and Pharmacological Research, 13(2), 198-206.
8. Casati A, Danelli G, Berti M, Fioro A, Fanelli A, Benassi C, et al. Intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine for lower limb outpatient surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical evaluation. AnesthAnalg 2006; 103(1): 234-38.
9. Forster JG, Rosenberg PH. Revival of old local anaesthetics for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. CurrOpinAnaesthesiol 2011; 24(6): 633-37.
10. Tiwari JP, Mishra V, Prasad B, Tripathi DK, Negi DS. A comparative evaluation of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine with minidose fentanyl in lower and orthopaedic surgeries. IOSR-JDMS 2016; 15(4): 41-45.
11. Srinivasagam K, Chandrasekaran A, Nanthaprabu M. Intrathecal buprenorphine, clonidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in lower abdominal surgeries. IOSR- JDMS 2016; 15(7): 25-30.
12. Lee A, Shatil B, Landau R, Menon P, Smiley R. Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine 3% Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.75% for Cervical Cerclage: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. AnesthAnalg. 2022 Mar 1;134(3):624-632. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005653. PMID: 34153006.
13. Camponovo C, Wulf H, Ghisi D, Fanelli A, Riva T, Cristina D, et al. Intrathecal 1% 2- Chloroprocaine vs. 0.5% bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: a prospective, observer – blinded, randomized, controlled trial. ActaAnaesthesiolScand2014; 58(5) : 560- 66.
14. Gu L, Smith C R, Ihnatsenka B, et al. (March 03, 2023) Comparing Spinal Chloroprocaine to Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: A Retrospective Study. Cureus 15(3): e35729. DOI 10.7759/cureus.35729
15. Ghisi, D., Boschetto, G., Spinelli, A.M. et al. Spinal anaesthesia with ChloroprocaineHCl 1% for elective lower limb procedures of short duration: a prospective, randomised, observer-blind study in adult patients. BMC Anesthesiol 21, 58 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01279-9
16. Vath JS, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: The effect of added fentanyl. AnesthAnalg 2004; 98(1): 89-94.
17. Lacasse MA, Roy JD, Forget J, Vandenbroucke F, Seal RF, Beaulieu D, et al. Comparison of bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia for outpatient surgery: A double-blind randomized trial. Can J Anesth 2011; 58(4): 384-91.
18. Teunkens A, Vermeulen K, Van Gerven E, Fieuws S, Van de Velde M, Rex S. Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy in an outpatient setting: A Double – Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. RegAnesth Pain Med. 2016; 41(5): 576 - 83
19. Gebhardt V, Zawierucha V, Schoffski O, Schwarz A, Weiss C, Schmittner MD. Spinal anaesthesia with chloroprocaine 1% versus total intravenous anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: A randomised controlled trial.Eur J Anaesthesiol2018 ; 35 (10):774-81
20. Tandan M, Lakra AM, Bhagat S, Dwivedi SK. Hyperbaric bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia in outpatient procedures: A comparative study. Indian J Appl Res 2018; 8(6): 22-25.
21. Casati A, Fanelli G, Danelli G, Berti M, Ghisi D, Brivio M, et al. Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine or preservative-free 2-chloroprocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison. AnesthAnalg 2007; 104(4): 959-64.
22. Gys B, Lafullarde T, Gys T, Janssen L. Intrathecal prilocaine, 2-chloroprocaine and bupivacaine for ambulatory abdominal wall herniorrhaphy: A prospective observational study. AmbulSurg 2017; 23: 8-12.
23. Kouri ME, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: A comparison with lidocaine in volunteers. AnesthAnalg 2004; 98(1): 75-80.
24. Zhang Y, Bao Y, Li L, Shi D. The effect of different doses of chloroprocaine on saddle anesthesia in perianal surgery. Acta Cir Bras 2014; 29(1): ISSN 0102-8650.
25. Forster JG, Rosenberg PH, Harilainen A, Sandelin A, Pitkanen A. Chloroprocaine 40 mg produces shorter spinal block than articaine 40 mg in day-case knee arthroscopy patients. ActaAnaesthesiolScand2013; 57(7): 911-19.