COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RETROGRADE DISTAL FEMORAL NAILING AND DISTAL FEMORAL PLATING IN EXTRA ARTICULAR DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES

Main Article Content

Vivek Phanswal
Mohammad Shuaib

Keywords

distal femur fractures, internal fixation, retrograde nailing, distal femoral locking plates

Abstract

Background: Distal femoral fractures are among challenging orthopedic injuries. Anatomical Distal Femoral locked plating and retrograde nailing are now method of choices of fracture fixation in such patients. Purpose of present study was to compare anatomical distal femur locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing for treatment of extra articular distal femur fractures.


Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study including 38 patients of extra articular distal femur fractures was conducted in the Department of Orthopedic surgery. Patients were divided in two groups by random allocation. Patients of group I (20 patients) were treated by distal femoral locked plating and group II (18 patients) by retrograde distal femoral nailing using standard technique.


Results: The mean age of group I and group II were 52.5±16.8Years & 48.7±12.4 years respectively. The female – male ratio for both groups was matched (p=.075). The time of full weight bearing was significantly (p=0.004) less in nailing group. Bone union was seen earlier in group II (DFN) and it came to be statistically significant (p value-0.0006). Knee pain was present in 42.86% of patients in group II and it came out to be statistically significant (p<0.001). At the end of 1-year, Functional outcome assessed by Neer scoring system was statistically insignificant between the two groups, (group I 87.86%, group II 82.5%).


Conclusion: In our study functional results trended toward better outcomes in distal femoral nails than plates in terms of knee flexion, early weight bearing, less union time but incidence of knee pain is significantly higher in nailing group as compare to plating group.

Abstract 100 | Pdf Downloads 46

References

1. Neer CS 2nd, Grantham SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar fracture of the adult femur. A study of one hundred and ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967 Jun;49(4):591-613
2. Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Ali MS. Displaced fractures of the distal femur in elderly patients. Operative versus non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996; 78:110-4.
3. Gurkan V, Orhun H, Doganay M, Salioğlu F, Ercan T, Dursun M, et al. Retrograde intramedullary interlocking nailing in fractures of the distal femur. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009; 43:199-205.
4. Smith WR, Ziran BH, Anglen JO, Stahel PF. Locking plates: tips and tricks. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(10):2298-307.
5. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femoral fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: Surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):509-20
6. Gurkan V, Orhun H, Doganay M, Salioğlu F, Ercan T, Dursun M, et al. Retrograde intramedullary interlocking nailing in fractures of the distal femur. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2009;43(3):199-205
7. Handolin L, Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures--results in a series of 46 consecutive operations. Injury 2004;35(5):517-22
8. Hierholzer C, von Rüden C, Pötzel T, Woltmann A, Bühren V. Outcome analysis of retrograde nailing and less invasive stabilization system in distal femoral fractures: A retrospective analysis. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(3):243– 50.
9. Neubauer T, Ritter E, Potschka T, Karlbauer A, Wagner M. Retrograde nailing of femoral fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008;75(3):158‐166.
10. Agarwal S, Udapudi S, Gupta S.To Assess Functional Outcome for Intra-Articular and Extra-Articular Distal Femur Fracture in Patients using Retrograde Nailing or Locked Compression Plating. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2018;12(3):21-4
11. Bucholz RW, Heckman JD. Rockwood and Green’s fracture in Adults, 8th Edition 2015 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, a Walters Kluwer business, USA
12. Forster MC, Komarsamy B, Davison JN. Distal femoral fractures: a review of fixation methods. Injury 2006; 37:97-108.
13. Schütz M, Müller M, Krettek C, Höntzsch D, Regazzoni P, Ganz R, et al. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury 2001; 32:48-54.
14. Schütz M, Müller M, Regazzoni P, Höntzsch D, Krettek C, Van der Werken C, et al. Use of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in patients with distal femoral (AO33) fractures: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005; 125:102-8.
15. Fankhauser F, Gruber G, Schippinger G, Boldin C, Hofer HP, Grechenig W, et al. Minimal-invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures with the LISS (Less Invasive Stabilization System): a prospective study of 30 fractures with a follow up of 20 months. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:56-60.
16. Gill S, Mittal A, Raj M, Singh P, Singh J, Kumar S. Extra Articular Supracondylar Femur Fractures Managed with Locked Distal Femoral Plate or Supracondylar Nailing: A Comparative Outcome Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(5):19–23.
17. Papadokostakis G, Papakostidis C, Dimitriou R, Giannoudis PV. The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Injury 2005; 36:813-22.
18. Handolin L, Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures--results in a series of 46 consecutive operations. Injury 2004; 35:517-22
19. Markmiller M, Konrad G, Südkamp N. Femur–LISS and Distal Femoral Nail for Fixation of Distal Femoral Fractures: Are There Differences in Outcome and Complications? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2004;42(6):252-7
20. Gao K, Gao W, Huang J, Li H, Li F, Tao J, et al. Retrograde nailing versus locked plating of extra-articular distal femoral fractures: comparison of 36 cases. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(2):161–6.