ROLE OF DIFFERENT H REFLEX PARAMETERS IN DIAGNOSIS OF LUMBOSACRAL RADICULOPATHY ALONG WITH THEIR CORRELATION WITH MRI

Main Article Content

Dr. Sandip Kumar Parui, MD, MRCP(UK), FRCP(Edinburgh)
Dr. Santanu Mandal, DNB (General medicine)
Dr. Mainak Ranjan Baksi, MD

Keywords

H-reflex, MRI, Radiculopathy

Abstract

Objective:


To observe the changes of  H reflex and it’s different parameters in patients of chronic low back pain (clinically diagnosed as  radiculopthy.) and to correlate the findings with MRI.


Method:


It was an observational cross-sectional study on 51 patients with clinical diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy. First H-reflex study was done . Then findings were statistically analysed and correlated with their radiological counterpart.


Result:


Abnormal H-Reflex has the maximum percent prevalence (92%) followed by  H amplitude (88%); even more than percent prevalence of abnormal MRI (65%).


 Regarding the correlation with MRI, unilaterally absent H reflex showed extremely statistically significant correlation (P=0.0004).


  Apart from it, H reflex as a whole, H amplitude, H latency, bilaterally absent H reflex had statistically significant correlation with MRI (P<0.05).


Conclusion:


Nerve conduction studies, specially H reflex with its individual parameters can be used as efficient diagnostic tool for lumbosacral radiculopathy. It is evidenced by high percent prevalence of abnormal results of the above parameters as well as significant correlation  (by P value) and agreement (by Kappa coefficient) studies.

Abstract 75 | Pdf Downloads 55

References

1) BALAJI GHUGARE, PIYALI DAS, JAYSHRI GHATE et.al.Assessment of nerve conduction in evaluation of radiculopathy in chronic low back pain patients: Indian journal of physiology pharmacology, 2009: 54(1): 63- 68
2) Braddom RL. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc, Pennsylvania; 2007.
3) Della-Giustina DA. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of back pain. Emerg Med Clin North Am.1999; 178:77-83.
4) Dumitru D, Zwarts MJ. Radiculopathies. In: Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts M, editors. Electrodiagnostic medicine. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, Inc; 2002. p. 713–76.
5) Curtis W. Slipman, M , Zacharia Isaac, David A. Lenrow, Larry H. Chou et. Al; Clinical Evidence of Chemical Radiculopathy. In Pain Physician, Volume 5, Number 3, pp 260-265;2002
6) Frontera WR, Silver JK, Rizzo TD. Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2nd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.
7) Shahriar Nafissi1, Shahram Niknam1, Seyedeh Simindokht Hossein, Department of neurology, Tehran University, Iran ,Electrophysiological evaluation in lumbosacral radiculopathy. In: Ir J neurol 2012; 11(3); 83-86.
8) Sabbahi MA, Khalil M; Segmental H-reflex studies in upper and lower limbs of patients with radiculopathy. In Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Mar;71(3):223-7.
9) Mazzochio R, Scarfo GB, Cartolari R et al. Recruitment curve of soleus H-reflex in chronic back pain and lumbosacral radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskel Dis 2001; 2: 4.
10) Ayse Lee Robinson and Aaron Taylor Lee; Clinical and Diagnostic Findings in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy and Polyneuropathy. In American journal of clinical medicine. Vol.7; No. 2.
11) Ghugare BW, Singh RK, Patond KR, Joshi MU Assessment of nerve conduction study to establish most common electrophysiological predictor of lumbosacral radiculopathy among radiologically diagnosed L5S1 neural foramina compression cases. In Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2013 AprJun;57(2):209-13.
12) Bryan Tsao; The Electrodiagnosis of Cervical and Lumbosacral Radiculopathy. In Neurol Clin 25 (2007) 473–494