‘’ TO STUDY THE PERFORATION PERITONITIS CASES, DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT’’.
Main Article Content
Keywords
perforation peritonitis, exploratory laparotomy, wound dehiscence
Abstract
Introduction- Peptic ulcer perforation is a serious complication which affects 2-10% of peptic ulcer patients. Peptic ulcer perforation presents with an overall mortality of 10% although various authors had reported incidence between 1.3% and 20%. Being a life-threatening complication of peptic ulcer disease, it needs special attention with prompt resuscitation and appropriate surgical management if morbidity and mortality are to be contained.
Aim- was comparative study of Graham's omentopexy versus modified Graham's omentopexy in duodenal perforation.
Methods and materials- This prospective, single centre study done in NSCB Medical college jabalpur Madhya Pradesh from 2020 to 2022 for two years of periods. Total 180 patients studied
Results- There are duodenal perforation is most common found in 88.88% and then ileal perforation is 6.66%. other perforation like gastric, duodenal, jejunal, appendicular, colonic, rectal perforation also found. Most of the patients fall between 20-78 years of age in both A and B groups. The maximum number of patients were 72(40%) found in the age group of 40-50 years. There is 156 male and 24 females are present the study.
Post operative leakage was 7.5% and 1.25% respectively. There was 6.25% burst abdomen in group A and 1.25% in group B cases. 100 patients (67%) had perforation within range 0.5-1 cm in size. The postoperative complications in group A were wound infection 10[12.5%], bile leakage 6 [7.5%], respiratory complications 8 [10%], electrolyte imbalance 12 [15%], paralytic ileus 3 [3.75%], septic shock 5 [6.25%] and abdominal abscess in 5 [6.25%] and in group B were wound infection 6[7.5%], bile leakage 1 [1.25%], respiratory complications 3 [3.75%], electrolyte imbalance 5 [6.25%], paralytic ileus 2 [2.5%], septic shock 2 [2.5%] and abdominal abscess in 2 [3.75%]. Mortality rate in Group A (3.75%) and in Group B (1.25%). The overall mortality rate was 7.14%. In this study average hospital stay was 12.4 days in group A and 9.0 days in group B. conclusion- This study showed that modified Graham's patch repair is as effective as Graham's patch repair in terms of mean operative time period, timing of oral feed allow and mean hospital stay timing.
References
2. Soll AH. Peptic ulcer and its complications. In: Sleisinger & Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: Pathophysiology, th Diagnosis, Management. 6 ed. Edited by: Feldman M, Scharschmidt BF, Sleisenger MH, Philadelphia PA: W.B. Saunders; 1998:620-78.
3. Rajesh V, Sarathchandra S, Smile SR. Risk factors predicting operative mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Trop Gastroenterol. 2003;24:148-50.
4. Hermansson M, Von Holstein CS, Zilling T. Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:566-72.
5. Elnagib E, Mahadi SE, Mohamed E, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer in Khartoum. Khartoum Medical Journal. 2008 1(2):62-4.
6. Gabriel SE, Jaakkimaine L, Bombardier C. Risk for serious gastrointestinal complication related to use of non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs—a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2006;115:787.
7. Graham RR. The treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1937; 64:235-8.
8. Lau WY, Leung KH, Kwong KH, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated duodenal ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg. 1996;224:131-8.
9. Ohene-Yeboah M, Togbe B. Perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers in an urban African population. West Afr J Med. 2006;25:205-11.
10. Manakuru SR.Current management of peptic ulcer perforations. Pak J Med Sci. 2004;20(2):157-63.
11. Guglieminotti P, Bini R, Fontana D, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer with U-CLIP (R). World J Emerg Surg. 2009;29(4):28.
12. Arveen S, Jagdish S, Kadambari D. Perforated peptic ulcer in south India: An institutional perspective. World J Surg. 2009;32(8):1600-4.
13. Torab FC, Amer M, Abu-Zidan FM, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer: different ethnic, climatic and fasting risk factors for morbidity in Al-ain medical district, United Arab Emirates. Asian J Surg. 2009;32(2):95-101.
14. Bin-Talib AK, Razzaq RA, Al-Kathiri ZO. Management of perforated peptic ulcer in patients at a teaching hospital. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(2):245-50.
15. Balouch Q. Analysis of peptic ulcer perforation cases at CMC teaching hospital ,Larkana. Pak J Surg. 2004;20(2):79-81.
16. Dakubo JC, Naaeder SB, Clegg Lumptey JN. Gastroduodenal peptic ulcer perforation. East Afr Med J. 2009;86(3):100-9.
17. Mehboob M, Khan JA, Saleem SM, et al. Peptic duodenal perforation: An audit. J Coll Physcians Surg Pak. 2000;10(£):101- 3.
18. Plummer JM, McFarlane ME, Newnham. Surgical management of perforated duodenal ulcer: the changing scene. West Indian Med J. 2004;53:378-81.
19. Nuhu. Acute perforated duodenal ulcer in Maiduguri. The internet journal of surgery. 2009;21:1.
20. Chalya. Clinical profile and outcome of surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcers in Northwestern Tanzania: A tertiary hospital experience. World journal of emergency surgery. 2011;6:3
21. Lawal 0, Fadiran OA, Oluwale SF Campbell B. Clinical pattern of perforated prepyloric and duodenal ulcer at le-ffe, Nigeria. Trop Doct. 1998; 28: 152-5.
22. Subedi SK, Afaq A, Adhikary S, Niraula SR, Agrawal CS. Factors influencing mortality perforated duodenal ulcer following emergency surgical repair. J Nepal M Assoc. 2007; 46:31-5.
23. Anuhu, Madziga, B GaIi. Acute perforated duodenal ulcer In Maiduguri. The Internet Journal of surgery,2008.
24. Rajput IA, Igbal M, Manzar S. Comparison of omentopexy techniques for duodenal perforation. Pak J Surg.2000; 16: 1-4.
25. Mani Charan Satapathy, Dharitri Dash, Charan Panda Modified Graham's omentopexy in acute perforation of first part of duodenum; A tertiary level experience in South India Surgical Journal, September — December, 2013.
26. Umran Muslu, Ali Kagan Gokakin, Ayesgul Demir, Orhan Ureyen, Ozcan Altinel, Eyup Sabri Tezcan, Mustafa Atabey, Gunduz Akgol, Hudai Genc. Mortality and Morbidity. Risk factors in surgery of peptic ulcer perforation. Cumhuriyet Med J. 2012; 34: 189-193.
27. Pai D, Sharma A, Kanungo R, Jagdish S, Gupta A. Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: A prospective controlled study. Aus. N Z J Surg. 1999; 69: 210- 3.
28. Aeveen S, Jagdish S, Kadambari D. Perforated peptic ulcer in South India: An institutional perspective World J Surg. 2009;33: 1600-4.
29. Ng EK, Chung SC, Sng JJ, Lan YH, Lee DW, Lau JY.High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer perforations not caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs . Br J Surg. 1996; 83: 1779-81
30. Nishikant, jilani, Mudhol S. Contractor, Ravikumar Choudhari and Sushila Garag. Im mediate Results of omentopexy in Perforated Duodenal UIcer.-A study of 186 cases Al Ame en J Med Sci. 2012;5(1):29-38
31. Ohene — Yeboah M, Togbe B. Perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers in an urban African population. West Afar J Med 2006; 25: 20S-11
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dr Asif Ahmed Khan Abdullah
Department of General Surgery, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, Chhattisgarh,
Dr Rishikesh Sinha
Department of General Surgery, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Dr Aafreen Syed
Department of General Surgery, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur
Dr. Ankush lokhande
Resident, Department of General Surgery, NSCB, Jabalpur