A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS OF ANTITUBERCULAR DRUGS AT TERTIARY CARE CENTER.

Main Article Content

Dr Anusha SJ
Dr. Puneet K Nagendra
Dr Pratibha D Nadig
Uppada Vibha.

Keywords

Anti-tubercular therapy, Fixed dose combination, Adverse Drug Reaction.

Abstract

The National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP) in India implemented the daily weight-based Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Anti-tuberculosis Treatment (ATT) regime to enhance compliance, and ultimately lead to better treatment outcomes. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant element that can affect an ATT regime's treatment compliance and results. As a result, vigilant monitoring for adverse reactions in patients receiving anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) is necessary


 Objectives: i) To assess the pattern and frequency of adverse drug reactions with a fixed-dose combination of anti-tubercular drugs ii) To determine the causality, severity, and factors that predispose to the development of adverse drug reactions.


Methodology: A 6-month cross-sectional observational study was undertaken at the tertiary care hospital Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education and Research (CDSIMER). 120 patients with tuberculosis were included in the study after obtaining informed consent. Data was collected and analysed on demographics, treatment regimes, and any adverse drug reactions (ADRs) experienced. The statistical analysis test chi-square aimed to identify significant factors linked to adverse drug reactions. Additionally, the WHO causality assessment scale and the modified Hartwig and Siegel scale were used to analyse the causality and severity of any reported ADRs.


Results- 43 out of 120 patients had an adverse reaction. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were most common followed by dermatological issues. According to the WHO causality scale, the majority of ADRs were probable and mild on the modified Hartwig-Siegel scale. The study found that urban, female, and employed individuals had higher rates of ADRs.


Conclusion- ATT-induced ADRs are frequent. As a result, monitoring and counselling patients about their lifestyle, as well as early diagnosis and care, will reduce the incidence of ADRs and enhance treatment adherence.

Abstract 145 | PDF Downloads 78

References

1. Manju R, Maheshwari YN, Ramya JE, Krishnamoorthy K. Adverse drug reaction monitoring of antitubercular drugs during intensive phase at tertiary care medical college hospital: A prospective study. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2020;10(11):976-980.
2. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. INDIA TB REPORT. 2022. Available from: https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/IndiaTBReport2022/TBAnnaulReport 2022.pdf
3. Singh et al., the overall prevalence of ADRs with first-line anti-TB drugs varied from 8.4% to 83.5% (6) Singh A, Prasad R, Balasubramanian V, Gupta N, Gupta P. Prevalence of adverse drug reaction with first-line drugs among patients treated for pulmonary tuberculosis. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2015;3:S80–S90.
4. Hanumaiah V, Ranganath DD, Kakkuppi N. Assessment of adherence to anti tuberculosis medication for successful implementation of revised national tuberculosis programme at a tertiary care hospital, Shimoga: Across-sectional observational study. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology.2019:8(11).
5. Cheah MF, Zainal H, Hyder Ali IA. Evaluation of adverse reactions induced by anti-tuberculosis drugs in Hospital Pulau Pinang. Malays J Med Sci. 2018;25(5):103–114.
6. Kiran M, Nagabushan H. Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring in Patients on Antitubercular Treatment in Tertiary Care Hospital, Mandya. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal. 2021;14(2).
7. World Health Organisation. Pharmacovigilance in Tuberculosis care.2013.Available from https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/PharmacoTB web_v3.pdf.
8. Jameson JL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Loscalzo J. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 20th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education/Medical; 2018.
9. Jawetz M. Medical Microbiology. 23rd ed. New York. McGrawHill Medical; 2004.
10. The Use of the WHO UMC System for Standardised Case Causality Assessment. Available from: http://www.WHOUMC.org/graphics/4409.pdf.

11. Hartwig S, Siegel J, Schneider P. Preventability and Severity Assessment in Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions. Am JHosp Pharm.1992;49: 2229-2232.

12. Mate, Kapil , et al. “Adverse Drug Reactions to a Daily Fixed-Dose Combination Based Antituberculosis Treatment Regime in India’s National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme: A Prospective Cohort Study.” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2022;16(8):14–19.
13. Cheah MF, Zainal H, Hyder Ali IA. Evaluation of adverse reactions induced by anti-tuberculosis drugs in Hospital Pulau Pinang. Malays J Med Sci. 2018;25(5):103–114
14. Sinha K, Marak IT, Singh W. Adverse drug reactions in tuberculosis patients due to directly observed treatment strategy therapy: experience at an outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital in the city of Imphal, Manipur, India. The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians. 2013;1(2):50.
15. Damasceno GS, Guaraldo L, Engstrom EM, Theme Filha MM, Souza-Santos R, Vasconcelos AG, et al. Adverse reactions to anti-tuberculosis drugs in Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Clinics. 2013;68(3):329–337.
16. Anand AC, Seth AK, Paul M, Puri P. Risk Factors of Hepatotoxicity During Anti-tuberculosis Treatment. Med J Armed Forces India. 2006;62(1):45–49.
17. Kurniawati F, Sulaiman SAS, Gillani SW. Adverse drug reactions of primary anti-tuberculosis drugs among tuberculosis patients treated in chest clinic. International Journal of Pharmacy and Life Sciences. 2012;3(1):1331–1338.
18. Maqusood M, Khan F A, Swaroop A. A Study on Incidence of Adverse Drug Reaction of AntiTubercular Drugs in New Cases of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Int J Med Res Prof. 2016;2(3):53-56.