Nurse records of comparative study between Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed

Main Article Content

Hussain Saleh Mohammed Alyami, YOUSSEF SALEH HUSSAIN Zubayd, Salem masoud falah zubayd , Hussain masoud falah zubayd , Fayez Saleh Mohammed Alyami , Falah masoud falah zubayd , Ali Muhammad Saleh Zubaid , Salem hamad hassan alshariah

Keywords

mobile X-ray; nursing homes; frail elderly; healthcare.

Abstract

Frail patients may benefit from receiving X-ray examinations at home to avoid the stress of hospital transport. This study investigated the impact of mobile X-ray on healthcare for such individuals ,with the primary outcome being the frequency of hospitalizations.


Methods: Data were collected through questionnaires and Electronic Patient Records (EPR) from frail patients referred for mobile X-ray examinations in nursing homes and elderly care facilities. Mobile X-ray examinations were compared to hospital-based X-rays.


Results: Analysis of data from 136 enrolled patients revealed no significant differences in hospitalizations or duration of hospital stays between mobile X-ray and hospital-based X-ray. Challenges encountered during the study included reluctance from doctors to refer patients for hospital-based X-rays and concerns from nursing home staff regarding patient frailty during post-X-ray questioning. Adjustments were made to the randomization method to address bias in initial data collection.


Conclusions: While mobile X-ray did not significantly reduce hospitalizations compared to hospital-based X-ray in this exploratory study, it remains a valuable diagnostic tool for precise treatment in cases where hospital transportation is burdensome. Further research focusing on this aspect and conducting RCT studies in populations where mobile X-ray has not been previously explored is recommended.

Abstract 75 | pdf Downloads 27

References

1. Graverholt B, Forsetlund L, Jamtvedt G. Reducing hospital admissions from nursing homes: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:36.
2. Graverholt B, Riise T, Jamtvedt G, et al. Acute hospital admissions from nursing homes: Predictors of unwarranted variation? Scand J Public Health. 2013;41:359-365.
3. Graverholt B, Riise T, Jamtvedt G, et al. Acute hospital admissions among nursing home residents: A population-based observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:126.
4. Kihlgren AL, Nilsson M, Skovdahl K, et al. Older patients awaiting emergency department treatment. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18:169-176.
5. Aldridge RW, Hayward AC, Hemming S, et al. Effectiveness of peer educators on the uptake of mobile X-ray tuberculosis screening at homeless hostels: A cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008050.
6. Datta B, Hazarika A, Shewade HD, et al. Digital chest X-ray through a mobile van: Public private partnership to detect sputum negative pulmonary TB. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:96.
7. Dozet A, Ivarsson B, Eklund K, et al. Radiography on wheels arrives to nursing homes—An economic assessment of a new health care technology in southern Sweden. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22:990-997.
8. Eklund K, Klefsgard R, Ivarsson B, et al. Positive experience of a mobile radiography service in nursing homes. Gerontology. 2012;58:107-111.
9. Kjelle E, Kleven L, Olerud HM, et al. Cost analysis of mobile radiography services for nursing home residents in Southeast Norway. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25:275-281.
10. Kumar A, Khattar P, Tiwari VK, et al. An assessment of functioning of mobile medical units in Jharkhand. Indian J Public Health. 2009;53:157-160.
11. Montalto M, Shay S, Le A. Evaluation of a mobile X-ray service for elderly residents of residential aged care facilities. Aust Health Rev. 2015;39:517-521.
12. Morishita F, Garfin AM, Lew W, et al. Bringing state-of-the-art diagnostics to vulnerable populations: The use of a mobile screening unit in active case finding for tuberculosis in Palawan, the Philippines. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0171310.
13. Ricauda NA, Tibaldi V, Bertone P, et al. The RAD-HOME project: A pilot study of home delivery of radiology services. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1678-1680.
14. Story A, Aldridge RW, Abubakar I, et al. Active case finding for pulmonary tuberculosis using mobile digital chest radiography: An observational study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16:1461-1467.
15. Thingnes E, Stalsberg R. Kvalitative aspekter ved innføring av mobile røntgentjenester til sykehjem. En studie av tre faggruppers forventninger [Qualitative aspects on establishing mobile radiography services for nursing homes. A study of three professional groups expectations]. Nordisk Tidsskrift Helseforskning. 2010;6:14-28.
16. Vigeland E, Bohm RE, Rostad A, Lysdahl KB. Mobile X-ray service for nursing homes. J Nor Med Assoc. 2017;137:198-202.
17. Loeb M, Carusone SC, Goeree R, et al. Effect of a clinical pathway to reduce hospitalizations in nursing home residents with pneumonia: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:2503-2510.
18. Loeb MB, Carusone SB, Marrie TJ, et al. Interobserver reliability of radiologists’ interpretations of mobile chest radiographs for nursing home-acquired pneumonia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006;7:416-419.
19. Ottawa, O.N. Portable versus Fixed X-ray Equipment: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Costeffectiveness, and Guidelines. 2016. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK350586/ (accessed on 29 April 2020).
20. McClester Brown MD, Sloane PD, Kistler CE, et al. Evaluation and Management of the Nursing Home Resident with Respiratory Symptoms and an Equivocal Chest X-ray Report. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:1164-e1.
21. Toppenberg MD, Kjeldsen AS. Evaluation of the Pilot Project Mobile X-ray at the Department of Radiology. Aarhus Univ. Hosp. 2016;30:208-220.
22. Toppenberg M, Christiansen T, Rasmussen F, et al. Mobile X-ray outside the Hospital: A review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020.
23. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, et al. Clarifying confusion: The confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:941-948.
24. Gregersen M, Jordansen MM, Gerritsen DL. Overall Quality of Life (OQoL) questionnaire in frail elderly: A study of reproducibility and responsiveness of the Depression List (DL). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;60:22-27.
25. Gerritsen DL, Steverink N, Ooms ME, de Vet HC, Ribbe MW. Measurement of overall quality of life in nursing homes through self-report: The role of cognitive impairment. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:1029-1037.
26. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.
27. Kirkwood BR, Sterne SJ. Essential Medical Statistics, 2nd ed.; Blackwell Science Inc.: Malden, MA, USA, 1988.
28. Higgins JP, White IR, Wood AM. Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2008;5:225-239.
29. Sheikj JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale: Recent Evidence and Development of a Shorter Version; The Hawthorne Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986; Volume 5, pp. 165–173.
30. Linn, B.S.; Linn, M.W.; Gurel, L. Cumulative illness rating scale. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1968;16:622–626.
31. Gerritsen, D.L.; Steverink, N.; Ooms, M.E.; de Vet, H.C.; Ribbe, M.W. Measurement of overall quality of life in nursing homes through self-report: The role of cognitive impairment. Qual. Life Res. 2007;16:1029–1037.