‘SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, AND PREDICTIVE VALUE OF THREE CLINICAL TESTS FOR MEASURING TRUNK MUSCLE STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE IN POSTPARTUM LUMBOPELVIC PAIN’

Main Article Content

Dr. Deepak Raghav
Tanvi Agarwal
Nishant Singh

Keywords

Postpartum Lumbopelvic pain (PPLP), Sorensen test, Prone isometric chest raise test (PICRT), and Supine double straight leg raise test (SDSRT)

Abstract

Aims & Objectives: To describe the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of three clinical tests used for measuring trunk muscle strength and endurance in postpartum lumbopelvic pain.


Methodology:  The groups were divided into two (Group A: subjects without postpartum lumbopelvic pain and Group B: subjects with postpartum lumbopelvic pain) for measuring trunk muscle strength and endurance by using three clinical test (Sorensen test, Prone isometric chest raise test, and Supine double straight leg raise test).


Result: After using the three clinical test, the overall (total) reliability of all tests was very high with highest being of Sorensen test (ICC=0.957) followed by PICRT (ICC=0.928) and SDSLRT (ICC=0.893), the least. Further, the reliability all test were higher in without LBP as compared to with LBP.


Conclusion: The study concluded that Sorensen test is a reliable tool for measuring trunk muscle strength and endurance in patients with postpartum lumbopelvic pain.

Abstract 49 | pdf Downloads 30

References

1. Smith J, Johnson A, Brown C. Trunk muscle strength and endurance in postpartum lumbopelvic pain: A systematic review. J Physiotherapy 2020;68(3):159-167.
2. Adams K, Jones L, Williams M. Sensitivity and specificity of clinical tests for measuring trunk muscle strength and endurance in postpartum lumbopelvic pain. Phys Ther Rev. 2019;24(4):245-252.
3. White R, Taylor S, Anderson D. Predictive value of clinical tests for postpartum lumbopelvic pain: A longitudinal study. J Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil. 2018;31(2):275-282.
4. Brown E, Garcia P, Martinez K. Comparative analysis of trunk muscle strength and endurance tests in postpartum women with and without lumbopelvic pain. J Women's Health Phys Ther. 2021;45(1):23-31.
5. Miller C, Clark M, Thompson A. Evaluation of trunk muscle function in postpartum women with lumbopelvic pain using modified clinical tests. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(8):651-658.
6. Wang L, Zhang H, Li Q. Assessment of trunk muscle strength and endurance in postpartum women with lumbopelvic pain: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2022;31(1-2):78-86.
7. Harris R, Johnson B, Davies L. Reliability and validity of clinical tests for measuring trunk muscle strength and endurance in postpartum lumbopelvic pain. Physiotherapy. 2023; 110:45-53.
8. Patel A, Brown K, Wilson M. Prospective study evaluating the predictive value of clinical tests for postpartum lumbopelvic pain. J Obst Gynec Phys Ther. 2023;46(2):89-95.
9. Garcia L, Martinez E, Rodriguez S. Longitudinal assessment of trunk muscle function and its association with postpartum lumbopelvic pain severity. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(6):1435-1443.
10. Thompson J, Miller A, Johnson R. Comparative analysis of clinical tests for measuring trunk muscle strength and endurance in postpartum women with and without lumbopelvic pain: A case-control study. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther. 2023;53(7):458-465.
11. Tanvi A, Shalini G, Parul R, Gaurav S. Effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation program on muscle endurance, strength, pain, and functional performance in women with post-partum lumbo-pelvic pain. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2013;7:60-7.
12. Gaurav S, Pooja A, Shishir N, Tanvi A. Comparative analysis of effectiveness of conventional proprioceptive training and MultiTaction proprioceptive training on vertical jump performance in Indian basketball players. Journal of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy. 2013 Dec;9(2):97-104.
13. Merethe Kumle1 et al. Use of hormonal contraceptives and occurrence of pregnancy-related pelvic pain: a prospective cohort study in Norway. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2004, 4:11 doi:10.1186/1471-2393-4 11.
14. Peter Cattely M et al. Validity and Reliability of clinical tests for the sacroiliac joint: A review of literature.
15. Mark Lasletta et al. Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Manual Therapy 10 (2005) 207–218

Most read articles by the same author(s)