“A STUDY ON ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERN, MOLECULAR PROFILING AND ITS SEQUENCING ANALYSIS OF TRICHOPHYTON RUBRUM ISOLATED FROM A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE”.

Main Article Content

Deepak Kumar
Gautam Kumar Das
Deepika Shukla
Nashra Afaq
Deepak Shukla
Amit Kumar Singh

Keywords

Antifungal Susceptibility, Trichophyton rubrum, Molecular Profiling, DNA, PCR, Sequencing

Abstract

Introduction: Trichophyton rubrum is the most common aetiological agent of human dermatophytoses. These infections mainly occur in keratinised layers such as skin, hair and nails because the fungus uses keratin as a nutrient source. T. rubrum being the most common etiological agent isolated from clinically diagnosed lesions of cutaneous dermatophytosis. It has a significantly higher capacity of transmission than other anthropophilic dermatophytes. 


Aim and Objective: To study the Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern , Molecular Profiling and its Sequencing Analysis of Trichophyton rubrum isolated from patients.


Material and Methods : This was a  prospective study carried out in the Department of Microbiology.  A total of 380 clinically suspected cases of superficial fungal infection were collected with proper informed consent. Dermatophytosis was confirmed in cases by direct microscopy and culture methods. Antifungal drug susceptibility profiles,  MIC of isolates were 50 90 determined using the broth microdilution method according to the CLSI guidelines 2022. The DNA isolation was done using the Qiagen DNA extraction kit followed by the conventional PCR. The sequencing methods were used for the genetic analysis of virulence gene for the confirmation.


Results : In the present study out of the total of 380 clinically suspected cases of superficial fungal infection 39 isolates of Trichophyton rubrumwere studied.  The ratio of Male were more 32 (82.05%) as compared to the Female  7(17.94% ). The maximum number of isolates was found in the Skin 36(92.30%) followed by the Nail 3 (7.69%). The ITZ was most sensitive toward T. rubrum than KTZ, TBF, and FCZ. The molecular characterization for the detection of  18s gene was performed  which was confirmed by the Sequencing Analysis.


Conclusion : The fungal genome's genetic diversity has led to an increase in antifungal resistance against T. rubrum during the past few decades. The gold standard method for identifying T. rubrum is molecular identification, which plays a significant role in the development of strategies for the prevention and treatment of fungal infections.

Abstract 166 | pdf Downloads 80

References

1. Weitzman, I.; Summerbell, R.C. The Dermatophytes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 8, 240–259.
2. Chander, J. Test Book of Medical Mycology, 3rd ed.; Mehta Publishers: Maharashtra, India, 2009; pp. 122–146.
3. Sharma, V.; Kumawat, T.K.; Sharma, A.; Seth, R.; Chandra, S. Dermatophytes: Diagnosis of dermatophytosis and its treatment. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2015; 9, 1286–1293
4. Bhatia, V.K.; Sharma, P.C. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations of itraconazole, terbinafine and ketoconazole against dermatophyte species by broth microdilution method. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2015; 33, 533–537. [PubMed]
5. Bhatia, V.K.; Sharma, P.C. Epidemiological studies on dermatophytosis in human patients in Himachal Pradesh, India. Springerplus 2014; 3, 134.
6. Verma S, Madhu R. The great Indian epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis: An appraisal. Indian J Dermatol. 2017; 62:227–36.
7. Dogra S, Narang T. Emerging atypical and unusual presentations of dermatophytosis in India. Clin Dermatol Rev. 2017; 1(Suppl S1):12–8.
8. Nenoff P, Herrmann J, Gräser Y. Trichophyton mentagrophytes sive interdigitale? A dermatophyte in the course of time. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007; 5 (3): 198-202.
9. Tartabini ML, Bonino GS, Raccab L, et al. Taxonomic study of clinic isolates of Trichophyton in Rosario, Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2013; 45 (4): 248-253.
10. Petrucelli, M. F., Abreu, M. H., Cantelli, B., Segura, G. G., Nishimura, F. G., Bitencourt, T. A., Marins, M., & Fachin, A. L. Epidemiology and Diagnostic Perspectives of Dermatophytoses. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland). 2020; 6(4), 310.
11. Gräser Y, Kühnisch J, Presber W. Molecular markers reveal exclusively clonal reproduction in Trichophyton rubrum. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37:3713–3717.
12. Gräser Y, Fröhlich J, Presber W, de Hoog S. Microsatellite markers reveal geographic population differentiation in Trichophyton rubrum. J Med Microbiol. 2007; 56:1058–1065. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47138-0
13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, M38-3rd, edition, Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi, 2022.
14. Lee WJ, Song CH, Lee SJ, Kim do W, Jun JB, Bang YJ. Decreasing prevalence of microsporum canis infection in Korea: through analysis of 944 cases (1993-2009) and review of our previous data (1975-1992). Mycopathologia .2012; 173: 235-9.
15. Gabriela F. Persinoti. Whole-Genome Analysis Illustrates Global Clonal Population Structure of the Ubiquitous Dermatophyte Pathogen Trichophyton rubrum. Genetics. 2018; 208: 1657–1669.
16. 16. Deshmukh, S.K.; Verekar, S.V.; Shrivastav, A. The occurrence of keratinophilic fungi in selected soils of Ladakh (India). Nature 2010; 2, 1247–1252.
17. Grumbt M, Monod M, Staib P. Genetic advances in dermatophytes. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2011; 320(2):79-86.
18. 18. Dabas, Yubhisha et al. “Molecular Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Dermatophytes Following CLSI and EUCAST Guidelines.” Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 3,2 17. 23 Mar. 2017, doi:10.3390/jof3020017
19. Gamage, Hasanga et al. “Superficial fungal infections in the department of dermatology, University Hospital Jena: A 7-year retrospective study on 4556 samples from 2007 to 2013.” Mycoses vol. 63,6 (2020: 558-565. doi:10.1111/myc.13077
20. Poojary, Shital et al. “A Study of In vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Patterns of Dermatophytic Fungi at a Tertiary Care Center in Western India.” Indian journal of dermatology vol. 64,4 (2019): 277-284. doi:10.4103/ijd.IJD_456_18
21. Sarma, S.; Borthakur, A.K.A. Clinico—Epidermatological study of dermatophytoses in Northest India. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2007, 73, 427–428.
22. Patel, P.; Mulla, S.; Patel, D.; Shrimali, G. A study of superficial mycosis in south Gujarat region. Natl. J. Commun. Med. 2010; 1, 85–88.
23. Surendran, Kak et al. “A clinical and mycological study of dermatophytic infections.” Indian journal of dermatology vol. 59,3 (2014): 262-7.
24. Patel P, Mulla S, Patel D, Shrimali G. A study of superficial mycosis in south Gujarat region. Natl J Commun Med. 2010; 1(2):85-88.
25. Kannan P, Janaki C, Selvi GS. Prevalence of dermatophytes and other fungal agents isolated from clinical samples. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2006; 24(3):212.
26. Afshari, M. A., Shams-Ghahfarokhi, M., & Razzaghi-Abyaneh, M. Antifungal susceptibility and virulence factors of clinically isolated dermatophytes in Tehran, Iran. Iranian journal of microbiology. 2016; 8(1), 36–46.
27. Jiang, Y., Luo, W., Verweij, P. E., Song, Y., Zhang, B., Shang, Z., Al-Hatmi, A., Ahmed, S. A., Wan, Z., Li, R., & de Hoog, G. S. Regional Differences in Antifungal Susceptibility of the Prevalent Dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum. Mycopathologia. 2021; 186(1), 53–70.
28. Ebert A, Monod M, Salamin K, Burmester A, Uhrlaß S, Wiegand C, et al. Alarming India-wide phenomenon of antifungal resistance in dermatophytes: A multicentre study. Mycoses. 2020; 63(7):717–28.
29. Kaliyamoorthi D. Prevalence of dermatophytic infection among Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients in a Tertiary Level Hospital in Chennai, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2018; 7(06):2516-36.

Most read articles by the same author(s)