SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SECTOR: MOVING TOWARDS ZERO HUNGER AND FOOD SECURITY

Main Article Content

Habib Ur Rehman
Niamatullah Kakar
Inayatullah Kakar
Muhammad Bakhsh Bugti
Kaleemullah Mandokhail
Fazalur Rehman
Muhammad Musawir Khan
Bakht Muhammad Kakar
Asmatullah Khan
Jameel ur Rehman
Mujeeb ur Rehman
Qudratullah
Muhammad Farooq Tareen
Abdul Rehman Tareen
Ashraf Khan Barech
Altaf Hussain Baloch
Najeebullah Dummar

Keywords

Livestock, Sustainable Development Goal, Food security, Livelihood, Environment

Abstract

Animal production has been a vital part of human civilization for millennia, providing food, clothing and livelihoods. Livestock sector is crucial to the national economy of many developing countries since it is a source of food, income, and employment. The livestock sector in developing nations is experiencing difficulties with low productivity due to changes in demographics, socioeconomic circumstances, and climatic variables globally. Sustainable livestock management is the linchpin that harmonizes the need for animal-based products with ecological well-being. Sustainable livestock development is a broad and dynamic term, describes as a system of sufficient and profitable food production (animal products rich in important nutrients include foods such as milk, meat and eggs), to promote a certain scale or pattern of farming, to maximize production and to minimize release of environmentally harmful byproducts of livestock. As in many other developing countries, livestock sector in Pakistan is seen as crucial to reducing poverty and enhancing the nutritional status of the population. However, there is a need for significant improvements in feeding practices and animal productivity to exploit the genetic potential of livestock. Hence to improve nutritional value and utilization of existing feedstuffs, like the utilization of urea, molasses, and enzymes is very crucial to improve feed digestibility and consequently the strategic implementation of technologies for efficient maintenance of biomass from forages is crucial for livestock that are only seasonal in nature. However, new findings and utilization of novel anti-methanogenic feed additives is crucial to develop a viable , productive and environmentally sustainable livestock sector. Future feeding strategies for monogastric animals should incorporate the development and utilisation of novel protein feed ingredients, such as insects raised on indigestible plant residues, to support a circular bioeconomy and enhance productivity, particularly in small-scale poultry production. It is recommended that future policies prioritise the establishment of a productive and sustainable livestock sector in Pakistan by encouraging collaborative efforts between research and industry sectors, as well as by strengthening capacity building and developing research infrastructure.

Abstract 115 | PDF Downloads 42

References

1.Steinfeld, H. (2006). Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food & Agriculture Organization.
2.McKenna, E. (2018). Livestock: Food, Fiber, and Friends. University of Georgia, Press.
3.Shang, Z., Gibb, M., Leiber, F., Ismail, M., Ding, L., Guo, X., & Long, R. (2014). The sustainable development of grassland-livestock systems on the Tibetan plateau: problems, strategies and prospects. The Rangeland Journal, 36(3), 267-296.
4.FAO., (2018). The Future of Food and Agriculture—Alternative Pathways to 2050; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018; p. 224.
5.Herrero, M., Thornton, P., Gerber, P., & Reid, R. (2009). Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(2), 111-120.
6.Herrero, M., Grace, D., Njuki, J., Johnson, N., Enahoro, D., Silvestri, S., & Rufino, M. (2013). The roles of livestock in developing countries. animal, 7(s1), 3-18.
7.Mottet, A., & Tempio, G. (2017). Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges. World's Poultry Science Journal, 73(2), 245-256.
8.Enahoro, D., Mason-D’Croz, D., Mul, M., Rich, K., Robinson, T., Thornton, P., & Staal, S. (2019). Supporting sustainable expansion of livestock production in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa: Scenario analysis of investment options. Global food security, 20, 114-121.
9.Mizrahi, I., Wallace, R., & Moraïs, S. (2021). The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 19(9), 553-566.
10.Hashmi, H., Belgacem, A., Behnassi, M., Javed, K., & Baig, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Livestock and Related Food Security Implications—Overview of the Situation in Pakistan and Policy Recommendations. Emerging Challenges to Food Production and Security in Asia, Middle East, and Africa: Climate Risks and Resource Scarcity, 197-239.
11.Mehrabi, Z., Gill, M., Wijk, M., Herrero, M., & Ramankutty, N. (2020). Livestock policy for sustainable development. Nature Food, 1(3), 160-165.
12. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Govt of Pakistan, (2023). Headquarters: 21, Mauve Area, G-9/1, Islamabad; Pakistan 44080. pbs.gov.pk.
13.Economic Survey of Pakistan, 2021-2022. Govt. of Pakistan, Finance Division, Economic Advisor Wing, Islamabad. 14.Hameed, A., Tariq, M., Buerkert, A., & Schlecht, E. (2022). Constraints and prospects of utilising mountain pastures in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Pastoralism, 12(1), 41.
15.Steinfeld, H., Wassenaar, T., & Jutzi, S. (2006). Livestock production systems in developing countries: status, drivers, trends. Rev Sci Tech, 25(2), 505-516.
16.Wanjala, G., Astuti, P., Bagi, Z., Strausz, P., & Kusza, S. (2023). Livestock breeding for welfare, adaptation and sustainability: an overview of the novel traits and breeding concerns in sheep, dairy, beef and poultry. Állattenyésztés És Takarmányozás, 72(1), 1-21.
17.Arain, S., Rehman, Q., Azeem, M., Jahanzaib, M., Waheed, A., Riaz, A., & Shazinosh, M. (2023). Biotechnological therapies for animal reproduction in the livestock sector. Pure and Applied Biology (PAB), 12(2), 1269-1285. 18.Government of Punjab, (2014). The Punjab Livestock Breeding ACT, 2014. Accessed on March 10, 2023 from https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/pak143420.pdf.
19.Naeem, I., Siddiqi, S., Siddiqui, A., & Hasan, R. (2022). Exploring stakeholders’ experiences and perceptions regarding barriers to effective surveillance of communicable diseases in a rural district of Pakistan: a qualitative study. BMJ open, 12(11).
20.Gongal, G., Rahman, H., Thakuri, K., & Vijayalakshmy, K. (2022). An Overview of Transboundary Animal Diseases of Viral Origin in South Asia: What Needs to Be Done?. Veterinary Sciences, 9(11), 586.
21.Shaikh, T., Waseem, S., Ahmed, S., Swed, S., & Hasan, M. (2022). Infectious disease surveillance system in Pakistan: challenges and way forward. Tropical Medicine and Health, 50(1), 46.
22.Center for Disease Control (CDC), (2009). Accessed on March 10, 2023 from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseaseinfo/brucellosis_g.htm. 23.York, L., Heffernan, C., & Rymer, C. (2018). A systematic review of policy approaches to dairy sector greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2216-2224.
24.Tariq, M. (2020, December). Opportunities for Improving Feed Use Efficiency for Sustainable Dairy Production in Pakistan. In Proceedings (Vol. 73, No. 1, p. 11). MDPI.
25.Lemes, A., Garcia, A., Pezzopane, J., Brandão, F., Watanabe, Y., Cooke, R., & Gimenes, L., (2021). Silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 14092.
26.Jankowiak, A. (2021). Strengthening the Role of Local Clusters In Current Global Value Chains. Transformations in Business & Economics, 20-25.
27.Tarawali, S., Herrero, M., Descheemaeker, K., Grings, E., & Blümmel, M. (2011). Pathways for sustainable development of mixed crop livestock systems: Taking a livestock and pro-poor approach. Livestock science, 139(1-2), 11-21.
28.Devendra, C., & Thomas, D. (2002). Crop–animal systems in Asia: importance of livestock and characterisation of agro-ecological zones. Agricultural systems, 71(1-2), 5-15.