EVALUATION OF THE THICKNESS OF OXYGEN INHIBITION LAYER PRODUCED ON TWO DIFFERENT COMPOSITE MATERIALS: A STEREOMICROSCOPIC STUDY.
Main Article Content
Keywords
oxygen inhibition layer, surface treatment, short fiber composite, nanohybrid composite
Abstract
Aim: aim of this study was to evaluate the thickness of oxygen inhibition layer (oil), produced on two composite materials
Objective: To evaluate the thickness of oxygen inhibition layer (oil), produced on two different composite materials.
Material and method: The thickness of oil on 2 different composite materials group1 n=30 - fiber reinforced composite and group 2 n=30 - nanohybrid composite were evaluated. The materials were divided into 3 subgroups depending on the surface treatment given i.e - (control group- a,water spray group -b, ethanol group -c.The depth of the inhibition layer was measured using stereomicroscope around the periphery at a magnification of 40x .The results were recorded in micrometers between the outer boundary of the specimen and the polymerized–unpolymerized resin interface. Results: compared to composites of (Group 1b and Group 1c fiber reinforced composite), the (Group 2c and Group 2b nanohybrid composite) displayed a maximum thickness of OIL.
Conclusion: The oxygen inhibition layer, which serves as an intermediary layer, is kept on the composite's surface after being exposed to either ethanol or water spray.However, whether the oxygen inhibition layer was present or not, the short fiber-reinforced composite shown a propensity for cohesive fractures.
References
2. Suh BI. Oxygen‐inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2004 Sep;16(5):316-23.
3. Gaviria-Martinez A, Castro-Ramirez L, Ladera-Castañeda M, Cervantes-Ganoza L, Cachay-Criado H, Alvino-Vales M, Garcia-Luna G, López-Gurreonero C, Cornejo-Pinto A, Cayo-Rojas CF. Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: In vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec;22(1):1-3.
4. Bijelic‐Donova J, Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Oxygen inhibition layer of composite resins: effects of layer thickness and surface layer treatment on the interlayer bond strength. European journal of oral sciences. 2015 Feb;123(1):53-60.
5. Carrillo-Marcos A, Salazar-Correa G, Castro-Ramirez L, Ladera-Castañeda M, López-Gurreonero C, Cachay-Criado H, Aliaga-Mariñas A, Cornejo-Pinto A, Cervantes-Ganoza L, Cayo-Rojas CF. The microhardness and surface roughness assessment of bulk-fill resin composites treated with and without the application of an oxygen-inhibited layer and a polishing system: an in vitro study. Polymers. 2022 Jul 28;14(15):3053.
6. Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, Palin WM. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dental Materials. 2009 Nov 1;25(11):1338-46.
7. Shawkat ES. The effect of the oxygen inhibition layer on interfacial bond strengths and stain resistance of dental resin composites (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).
8. Panchal AC, Asthana G. Oxygen inhibition layer: A dilemma to be solved. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD. 2020 May;23(3):254.
9. Oyama K, Tsujimoto A, Otsuka E, Shimizu Y, Shiratsuchi K, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M. Influence of oxygen inhibition on the surface free energy and enamel bond strength of self-etch adhesives. Dental materials journal. 2012;31(1):26-31.
10. Lakshmi Mohan DS. Immediate dentin sealing: the dentin shield–a review.
11. Milenia LR, Nelis S, Purnomo BN, Hardini N. THE EFFECT OF GLYCERIN APPLICATION ON ROUGHNESS OF NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE RESIN IMMERSED IN ISOTONIC DRINK. Dentino: Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi.;8(1):86-90.
12. Finger WJ, Lee KS, Podszun W. Monomers with low oxygen inhibition as enamel/dentin adhesives. Dental Materials. 1996 Jul 1;12(4):256-61.