ASSESSMENT OF THE KEY DETERMINANTS FOR THE LONG-TERM SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS: AN APPLICATION OF THE MICMAC TECHNIQUE.
Main Article Content
Keywords
aesthetic dentistry, dental implants, key factors, bone quality, adherence to oral care.
Abstract
The present investigation used a mixed methodological strategy that combined qualitative and quantitative approaches. A review of the existing literature was carried out, and interviews with practitioners in the field were conducted to gather information on key factors in the practice of aesthetic dentistry. Next, the MICMAC technique (Applied Multiplication Cross Impact Matrices for a Classification) was applied to identify the relationships and dynamic structure between the variables. The results showed that the key factors in the long-term success of dental implants were adherence to oral care and maintenance, bone quality and quantity, maintenance and replacement costs, and implant design and surface. These findings provide a solid foundation for understanding key factors in the practice of aesthetic dentistry and may contribute to the improvement of the planning and treatment of dental implants to achieve successful and lasting results.
References
International journal of dentistry.
2. Arango, X., & Cuevas, V. (2014). Método de análisis estructural: matriz de impactos cruzados
multiplicación aplicada a una clasificación (MICMAC) . (Doctoral dissertation, Tirant Lo
Blanch).
3. Barati, A., Azadi, H., Dehghani, M., Lebailly, P., & Qafori, M. (2019). Determining key
agricultural strategic factors using AHP-MICMAC. . Sustainability, 11(14), , 3947.
4. Caffesse, R., & Echeverría, J. (2019). Treatment trends in periodontics. . Periodontology 2000,
79(1), 7-14.
5. Coli, P., & Jemt, T. (2021). Are marginal bone level changes around dental implants due to
infection? Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 23(2), , 170-177.
6. Ghiasi, P., Petrén, S., Chrcanovic, B., & Larsson, C. (2022). Comparative cost analysis of
different prosthetic rehabilitations for the edentulous maxilla: early results from a randomized
clinical pilot study. . BDJ open, 8(1), 8.
7. Herrera, J. (2017). La investigación cualitativa. UDGVirtua. Retrieved from
http://biblioteca.udgvirtual.udg.mx/jspui/handle/123456789/1167
8. Javed, F., Ahmed, H., Crespi, R., & Romanos, G. (2013). Role of primary stability for successful
osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. . Interventional
Medicine and Applied Science, 5(4), , 162-167.
9. Jiang, X., Yao, Y., Tang, W., Han, D., Zhang, L., Zhao, K., & Meng, Y. (2020). Design of dental
implants at materials level: An overview. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A,
108(8), 1634-1661.
10. Liu, Y., Rath, B., Tingart, M., & Eschweiler, J. (2020). Role of implants surface modification in
osseointegration: A systematic review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 108(3),
470-484.
11. López‐Píriz, R., Cabal, B., Goyos‐Ball, L., Fernández, A., Bartolomé, J., Moya, J., & Torrecillas,
R. (2019). Current state‐of‐the‐art and future perspectives of the three main modern implant‐
dentistry concerns: Aesthetic requirements, mechanical properties, and peri‐implantitis
prevention. . Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 107(7), 1466-1475.
12. Montero, J. (2021). A Review of the Major Prosthetic Factors Influencing the Prognosis of
Implant Prosthodontics. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(4), 816.
13. Patel, R. (2019). Dental implants for patients with periodontitis. . Primary Dental Journal, 8(4),
54-61.
14. Rosenstein, J., & Dym, H. (2020). Zygomatic implants: a solution for the atrophic maxilla. .
Dental Clinics, 64(2), 401-409.
15. Sampieri, H. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta.
México.: McGraw Hill.
16. Sharka, R., Abed, H., & Hector, M. (2019). Oral health‐related quality of life and satisfaction of
edentulous patients using conventional complete dentures and implant‐retained overdentures: An
umbrella systematic review. . Gerodontology, 36(3), 195-204.
17. Siebers, D., Gehrke, P., & Schliephake, H. (2010). Immediate Versus Delayed Function of Dental
Implants: A 1-to 7-year Follow-up Study of 222 Implants. International Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Implants, 25(6).
18. Steigenga, J., Al-Shammari, K., Nociti, F., Misch, C., & Wang, H. (2003). Dental implant design
and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant dentistry, 12(4), , 306-317.
19. Vandeweghe, S., Cosyn, J., Thevissen, E., Teerlinck,, J., & De Bruyn, H. (2012). The influence
of implant design on bone remodeling around surface‐modified Southern Implants. Clinical
Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 14(5), , 655-662.
20. Yao, J., Tang, H., Gao, X., McGrath, C., & Mattheos, N. (2014). Patients' expectations from
dental implants: a systematic review of the literature. Health and quality of life outcomes (12), 1-
14.
21. Zhao, Q., Wu, J., Li, Y., Xu, R., Zhu, X., Jiao, Y., & Ni, X. (2022). Promotion of bone formation
and antibacterial properties of titanium coated with porous Si/Ag-doped titanium dioxide.
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, (10), 1001514.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Piedad Mary Martelo Gómez
Odontologist. Independent researcher. Professor of the Dentistry Program at the Universidad de Cartagena, Colombia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5405-0324
Raul José Martelo Gómez
Specialist in Networks and Telecommunications; Master in Computer Science. Systems Engineer. Full-time Research Professor of the Systems Engineering Program at the University of Cartagena. Leader of the INGESINFO Research Group. Cartagena de Indias, Colom-bia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-0752
Javier Antonio Pinedo Cabarcas
Master in IT Strategic Management. Systems Engineer. Full-time Professor of the Systems Engineering Program at the University de Cartagena.