COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN TWO SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICES IN ANAESTHETISED, SPONTANEOUSLY VENTILATED ADULT PATIENTS DURING ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES
Main Article Content
Keywords
i-gel, Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic, airway management, elective surgery, anesthesia, supraglottic airway devices.
Abstract
Background: Airway management is a critical aspect of anesthesia, with the choice of supraglottic airway devices being a key consideration. This study compares the i-gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Classic in terms of insertion efficiency and ease of use in anaesthetised, spontaneously ventilated adult patients during elective surgeries.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, comparative study was conducted on 100 adult patients. Parameters assessed included insertion time, the number of attempts, and the ease of insertion. Hemodynamic parameters were also monitored.
Results: The i-gel demonstrated a significantly shorter insertion time (13.52±2.79 seconds) compared to the LMA Classic (26.38±3.05 seconds; p<0.0001). The first-attempt success rate was higher for the i-gel (90%) versus the LMA Classic (64%; χ²=9.76, p=0.0076). Quality of insertion was rated as easier in 90% of i-gel cases, as opposed to 62% for the LMA Classic (χ²=10.74, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The i-gel supraglottic airway device shows significant advantages over the LMA Classic in terms of insertion time, ease of insertion, and first-attempt success rate in elective surgeries. These findings support the preference for the i-gel in clinical practice, particularly in scenarios where time efficiency and ease of use are paramount.
References
2. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask--a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth. 1983 Aug;55(8):801-5.
3. Howes BW. Complications of the laryngeal mask airway. Can J Anaesth. 1994 Mar;41(3):194-200.
4. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Bronchospasm while inserting a laryngeal mask airway: a case report involving a patient with reactive airway disease. Anesthesiology. 1997 Nov;87(5):1243-4.
5. Gatward JJ, Cook TM, Seller C, Handel J, Simpson T, Vanek V, Kelly F. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia. 2008 Nov;63(11):1124-30.
6. Russo SG, Cremer S, Eich C, Jipp M, Cohnen J, Strack M, Quintel M, Mohr A. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel and LMA-Supreme in anaesthetized human volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;109(6):996-1004.
7. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of the I-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(10):1022-6.
8. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask--a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth. 1983;55(8):801-5.
9. Gatward JJ, Cook TM, Seller C, Handel J, Simpson T, Vanek V, Kelly F. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(11):1124-30.
10. Howes BW. Complications of the laryngeal mask airway. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41(3):194-200.
11. Russo SG, Cremer S, Eich C, Jipp M, Cohnen J, Strack M, Quintel M, Mohr A. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel and LMA-Supreme in anaesthetized human volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(6):996-1004.
12. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Bronchospasm while inserting a laryngeal mask airway: a case report involving a patient with reactive airway disease. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(5):1243-4.
13. Smith I, White PF. Use of the laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to a face mask during outpatient arthroscopy. Anesthesiology. 1992;77(5):850-5.
14. Verghese C, Brimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. AnesthAnalg. 1996;82(1):129-33.