PERIANAL FISTULAE: CLINICAL EXPERIENCE IN TERTIARY HEALTH CARE HOSPITAL

Main Article Content

Daniyal Javed
M Imran Anwar
Muhammad Hamza Laique
Muhammad Rizwan
Muhammad Zain ul Abid
Muhammad Ali Askari

Keywords

Perianal fistulae, clinical presentation, fistulotomy, fistulectomy

Abstract

Introduction: Perianal fistulae are the granulation tract between anus or rectum and overlying skin with incidence of 9/100,000. It mostly affects the males with male to female ratio of 1.8:1. Mean age of presentation is 41.6+/- 11.4 years. Causes of perianal fistulae mainly divided in to cryptoglandular and non cryptoglandular causes. The basic pathophysiology of perianal fistulae formation was explained by cryptoglandular hypothesis. Park classification is commonly used to stratify perianal fistulae. Its diagnosis is mainly clinical but MRI and endoanal ultrasound aids in diagnosis and formulation of treatment logarithm. Multiple treatment options are available for the management of perianal fistulae but results are disappointing because it has high reoccurrence rate. Aim of this study was to assess the clinical presentation and treatment given to patient.


Material And Method: Cross-sectional, observational retrospective study was conducted on 75 patients in general surgery and surgical oncology unit 2 of Sheikh Zayed Hospital in Lahore. The study lasted from January 27, 2022 to April 27, 2023. The non- probability, convenience sampling technique was used. Inclusion criteria include all patients with perianal symptoms and external perianal opening. Exclusion criteria include perianal fistulae due to secondary causes and recurrent perianal fistulae.


Results: In this study most of the patients were male (89.33%). With male to female ratio of 8.37:1. Mean age of presentation was 42.33+/- 12 years. Most common presentation of peri-anal fistulae was perianal discharge (75%) followed by peri-anal pain (60%). Most of the openings were located on posterior side (77%). Most common procedure done was fistulotomy (67%) followed by setone placement (20%). About 76% of the patients had single per-anal external opening.


Conclusion: Fistulae in ano is the most common pathology of the lower GI tract. That has a devastating impact on patient’s mental and social health. But early diagnosis and prompt treatment help reduce its complications.

Abstract 169 | pdf Downloads 102

References

1. Göttgens K. Current status and innovations in treatment of perianal and rectovaginal fistulas: are we still in the dark? 2015.
2. Cheung XC, Fahey T, Rogers AC, Pemberton JH, Kavanagh DO. Surgical management of idiopathic perianal fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestive Surgery. 2021;38(2):104-19.
3. Yadu S, Toppo A. Clinical presentation and outcome of fistula in ano cases. International Surgery Journal. 2018;5(9):3006-10.
4. Drager LF, Andrade MNB, Conceição SA, Cunha-Melo JR. Perianal fistula: retrospective study of surgical treatment of 241 cases. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 1998; 13:106-9.
5. Cadeddu F, Salis F, Lisi G, Ciangola I, Milito G. Complex anal fistula remains a challenge for colorectal surgeon. International journal of colorectal disease. 2015; 30:595-603.
6. Cirocco WC, Reilly JC. Challenging the predictive accuracy of Goodsall's rule for anal fistulas. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 1992; 35:537-42.
7. D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. The pathology of complex fistula in ano. Acta Chirurgica Belgica. 2000;100(3):111-4.
8. Kapoor S, Kumar A, Rally S, Kapoor V, Sandhu AS. Study of Clinical Presentation and Management of Patients Presenting With Fistula-in-ano. IOSR-JDMS. 2018;17(1):39-46.
9. Idris SA, Abdalla A, Hamza A. Classification of fistula in ano. Med J. 2015; 2:99-102.
10. Göttgens K, Smeets R, Stassen L, Beets G, Breukink S. Systematic review and meta- analysis of surgical interventions for high cryptoglandular perianal fistula. International journal of colorectal disease. 2015; 30:583-93.
11. Van Koperen P, Horsthuis K, Bemelman W, Stoker J, Slors J. Perianal fistulas: developments in the classification and diagnostic techniques, and a new treatment strategy. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008;152(51-52):2774-80.
12. Siddiqui MR, Ashrafian H, Tozer P, Daulatzai N, Burling D, Hart A, et al. A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2012;55(5):576-85.
13. Jacob TJ, Perakath B, Keighley MR. Surgical intervention for anorectal fistula. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010(5).
14. Göttgens K, Janssen P, Heemskerk J, Van Dielen F, Konsten J, Lettinga T, et al. Long- term outcome of low perianal fistulas treated by fistulotomy: a multicenter study. International journal of colorectal disease. 2015; 30:213-9.
15. Van Koperen PJ, Wind J, Bemelman WA, Bakx R, Reitsma JB, Slors FJ. Long-term functional outcome and risk factors for recurrence after surgical treatment for low and high perianal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2008;51(10):1475- 81.
16. Kotze PG, Shen B, Lightner A, Yamamoto T, Spinelli A, Ghosh S, et al. Modern management of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: future directions. Gut. 2018;67(6):1181-94.
17. Siddharth R, Kumar GA, Sreedhar S. Clinical study of fistula in ano. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2015;4(86):15082-8.
18. Khalil OM, Al Ozaibi L, Kaiyasah HM, Hejazi NA. Incidence and risk factors affecting development of perianal fistulas after drainage of perianal abscesses. Dubai Medical Journal. 2021;4(1):43-6.
19. Veerendra Kumar H. A Clinico-Pathological study of Fistula in ANO: RGUHS; 2010.

Most read articles by the same author(s)