EFFICACY OF COMBINED CRYOTHERAPY AND INTRALESIONAL MEGLUMINE ANTIMONIATE (GLUCANTIME®) VS. CRYOTHERAPY AND INTRALESIONAL MEGLUMINE ANTIMONIATE (GLUCANTIME®) ALONE FOR THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS

Main Article Content

Arfa Ikram
Mehak Mukhtar
Javeria Javed
Amina Rahat
Assad Ullah

Keywords

Efficacy, Intralesional Glucantime and Cryotherapy, Intralesional Glucantime, Cryotherapy, cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Abstract

Introduction: Leishmaniasis is categorized into three different clinical forms that are: visceral, mucocutaneous, and cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), of which the more frequent form is the cutaneous Leishmaniasis. There is a need for more effective and less time-consuming therapeutic methods for this condition.


Objectives: We ought to compare the efficacy of Intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime®) and cryotherapy combined whereas cryotherapy and Intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime®) alone for the    treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.


Materials and Methods: A total of 258 (86 patients in each group) were observed. Patients were allocated in three groups that are A, B, and C. Group-A had the combination of Intralesional Glucantime and Cryotherapy fortnightly. Group-B patients received Intralesional Glucantime alone fortnightly. Group-C patients were treated with Cryotherapy alone fortnightly.


RESULTS: In Group-A the mean age was 31.37 years ± 10.99 SD. In Group-B mean age was 31 years ± 10.56 SD while in Group-C mean age was 32.50 years ± 10.50SD.  In Group-A 61% of patients were male and 39% were female. In Group-B 58% of patients were male and 42% were female. In Group-C 59% of patients were male and 41% were female. Moreover, Group-A (Intralesional Glucantime and Cryotherapy) was effective in 98% patients, Group B (Intralesional Glucantime alone) was effective in 82% patients and Group C (Cryotherapy alone) was effective in 78% patients.


CONCLUSION: Our study concludes that it is more effective to use the combination of Intralesional Glucantime and Cryotherapy than either Intralesional Glucantime   or Cryotherapy alone for the treatment of cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Abstract 190 | PDF Downloads 76

References

1. M. Arboleda, N. Giraldo E, R. Vivas, N. Vidal, Successful Treatment with Intralesional Meglumine Antimoniate in Recurrent Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Case Report, J. Dermatology Cosmetol. 1 (2017) 48–51. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdc.2017.01.00011.
2. N. Ullah, M. Uzair, M. Khan, N.U. Khan, G. Butt, Comparative cost-effectiveness of intralesional meglumine antimoniate alone versus cryotherapy plus intralesional meglumine antimoniate in cutaneous leishmaniasis: Experience from a high capacity dermatology centre, J. Pakistan Assoc. Dermatologists. 32 (2022) 353–359.
3. A. Saghafipour, E. Mozaffari, F. Rezaei, The evaluation of intralesional Glucantime and cryotherapy plus intralesional Glucantime therapeutic efficacy on Zoonotic cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A randomized clinical trial, Int. J. Pediatr. 5 (2017) 6689–6696. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijp.2017.24545.2069.
4. I.D. Velez, E. Hendrickx, S.M. Robledo, S. del Pilar Agudelo, Gender and cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia, Cad. Saúde Pública / Ministério Da Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Esc. Nac. Saúde Pública. 17 (2001) 171–180.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2001000100018.
5. M.Z. Bhatti, S.M. Noor, M.M. Paracha, G. Ullah, Efficacy of combined intralesional meglumine antimoniate and cryotherapy versus cryotherapy alone for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis, J. Postgrad. Med. Inst. 32 (2018) 103–106.
6. J. Soto, E. Rojas, M. Guzman, A. Verduguez, W. Nena, M. Maldonado, M. Cruz, L. Gracia, D. Villarroel, I. Alavi, J. Toledo, J. Berman, Intralesional antimony for single lesions of Bolivian cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Clin. Infect. Dis. 56 (2013) 1255–1260.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit049.
7. R.E. da Silva, A.J. Toledo, M.C. Senna, A. Rabello, G. Cota, Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre., Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 111 (2016) 512–516.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760160183.
8. P. Layegh, F. Pezeshkpoor, A.H. Soruri, P. Naviafar, T. Moghiman, Efficacy of cryotherapy versus intralesional meglumine antimoniate (glucantime) for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in children., Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 80 (2009) 172–175.
9. M. Karamian, M.S. Faroghi Bojd, A. Salehabadi, M. Hemmati, D.A. Barati, Effectiveness of meglumine antimoniate against L. tropica in a recently emerged focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Birjand, eastern Islamic Republic of Iran, East. Mediterr. Heal. J. 21 (2015) 280–286. https://doi.org/10.26719/2015.21.4.280.
10. R.E. da Silva, A. Toledo Júnior, M.C. Senna, A. Rabello, G. Cota, Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 111 (2016).
11. A. Ul Bari, Epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis, J. Pakistan Assoc. Dermatologists. 16 (2006) 156–162.
12. V. Leibovici, H. Aram, Cryotherapy in acute cutaneous leishmaniasis., Int. J. Dermatol. 25 (1986) 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1986.tb03461.x.
13. A. Asilian, A. Sadeghinia, G. Faghihi, A. Momeni, Comparative study of the efficacy of combined cryotherapy and intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) vs. cryotherapy and intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) alone for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis., Int. J. Dermatol. 43 (2004) 281–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02002.x.

Most read articles by the same author(s)