TREATMENT OF COMPOUND DIAPHYSEAL TIBIA FRACTURES TREATED WITH EXTERNAL FIXATOR COMBINED WITH INTRAMEDULLARY TENS NAIL FOR LIMITED INTERNAL FIXATION AS DEFINITIVE PROCEDURE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Definitive fixation, External fixator, Limited internal fixation, TENS nail
Abstract
Background –Treating open fractures in the tibia has always been a challenge for orthopedic surgeons due to the complexities of the injury. External fixators are used in the treatment of these types of fractures as an initial stabilization method, followed by definitive surgical procedures. Several authors have used external fixators as a definitive method for the treatment of fractures, but there were difficulties in initial reduction and maintaining the reduction, thereby increasing the chances of malreduction, malunion, and non-union. Some authors used limited internal fixation to increase the biomechanical stability of the construct with good results, but very few have been reported in the literature. In our study, we used intramedullary tens nails along with external fixators as a method to improve the stability of the structure. and evaluated the outcome in terms of union, limb alignment, and infection.
Methods – We have operated on 20 cases of compound tibial diaphyseal fractures with external fixators along with intramedullary TENS nails. The patients were followed over a period of 9 months, and various parameters like limb alignment in the form of varus or valgus, anteroposterior angulation, limb shortening, status of union, and complications like pin tract infection, superficial and deep infection, and time to full weight bearing were assessed.
Results – In our study, we could achieve a union rate of 65% and a non-union rate of 15%. According to the modified Anderson and Hutchins criteria, good limb alignment could be achieved in 65%, moderate in 30%, and poor in 5%. Complications were only pin tract infections in 1 case. It took an average of 4.83 months for full weight bearing to be achieved.
Conclusion - As a definitive technique, external fixators paired with intramedullary TENS nails efficiently treat compound tibial diaphyseal fractures. Increased stability, an improved initial reduction, assistance in maintaining the reduction and length, a decreased risk of malalignment, and a delayed union are all provided without raising infection risk.
References
2. Zalavras CG, Marcus RE, Levin LS, Patzakis MJ. Management of open fractures and subsequent complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89:884–95.
3. Foote CJ, Guyatt GH, Vignesh KN, et al. Which surgical treatment for open Tibial shaft fractures results in the fewest reoperations? A network metaanalysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473:2179–92.
4. Robert W Bucholz, James D Heckman, Charles M, Court Brown. Rock wood and Green fracture in adults, 6th Edition, 2079. 2014.
5. Gasser B, Tiefenboeck TM, Oho AUID, et al. Damage control surgery - experiences from a level I trauma center. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18:391.
6. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH. Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2001; 83-B:62- 8. 7. Li Y, Jiang X, Guo Q, Zhu L, Ye T, Chen A. Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: a randomized, prospective study. Int Orthop. 2014; 38:1261–7.
7. Bosse MJ, Staeheli JW, Reinert CM. Treatment of unstable tibial diaphyseal fractures with minimal internal and external fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 1989; 3:223–31.
8. Spiegel PG, VanderSchilden JL. Minimal internal and external fixation in the treatment of open tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983:96–102.
9. Henley MB, Chapman JR, Agel J, Harvey EJ, Whorton AM, Swiontkowski MF. Treatment of type II, IIIA, and IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft: a prospective comparison of unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails and half-pin external fixators. J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12:1–7.
10. Corey RM, Park NK, Cannada LK. Segmental tibia fractures: an analysis of complication and healing rates. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32:296–300.
11. Satyanarayana J, Rao TN, Vadlamani KV, Kiran MC, Moorthy GV. Management of complex open fractures: a prospective study. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2015 Oct 1;4(79):13863-79.
12. Holbrook JL, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders R. Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft: ender nailing versus external fixation. A randomized, prospective comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71:1231–8.
13. Bach AW, Hansen ST Jr. Plates versus external fixation in severe open tibial shaft fractures. A randomized trial Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989 :89–94.
14. Hao ZC, Xia Y, Xia DM, Zhang YT, Xu SG. Treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures by external fixation combined with limited internal fixation versus simple external fixation: a retrospective cohort study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2019 Dec;20(1):1-8.
15. Velanzco A, Fleming LL. Open fractures of tibia treated by Hoffman external Fixator. Clin.Orthop. Relat. Research. 1983; 180:125-132.
16. Giannoudis PV. Surgical priorities in damage control orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 2003; 85-B:478-83
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dr Supratim Roy
Asst proff. in Department of Orthopaedics at MGIMS Sevagram
Dr Preetam Marutrao Salunkhe
Asst proff. in Department of Medicine at MGIMS Sevagram
Dr Bhavesh Patidar
Postgraduate student in Department of Orthopaedics at MGIMS Sevagram)
Dr Yogesh Bhangale
Postgraduate student in Department of Orthopaedics at MGIMS Sevagram
Dr. C M Badole
Director Proff. and HOD , Department of Orthopaedics, MGIMS Sevagram