ATTITUDE OF PRACTICING AND STUDENT HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS TOWARDS DOCTOR OF PHARMACY (PHARM D) PROGRAM AND CLINICAL PHARMACISTS IN SOUTH INDIA – AN INTERDISCIPLINARY, MULTI-CENTERED, CROSS-SECTIONAL EVALUATION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Attitude, Clinical pharmacy, Curriculum, Doctor of pharmacy, Healthcare providers.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to analyze the attitudes of practicing and student healthcare providers towards Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm D) students and clinical pharmacists in India. A cross-sectional, structured, self-administered questionnaire-based survey was conducted at randomly selected hospitals and educational institutions in four southern states of India. A total of 379 participants (214 healthcare providers and 165 students) in eight institutions were asked to complete the questionnaire over a period of six months. The responses were collected and analyzed to assess the attitudes of study population regarding the Pharm D. Course and clinical pharmacist’s roles in the hospital.
Results: More than 60% of the study population agreed that Pharm D. graduates can be designated the role of clinical pharmacist and agreed that they can contribute to decisions regarding drug interactions and adverse drug reaction; have special expertise in counseling the patient; are qualified to respond to drug treatment needs of the patients and can be involved in policy making concerning the hospital pharmacy services, but the respondents responded poorly when asked whether Pharm D’s should monitor the effects of drugs on the patients or when asked whether the physicians should consult clinical pharmacists for any drug-related query.
Conclusion: Overall, there was a positive response from the majority of the study population, but still a few people viewed the role of Pharm D. negatively. This survey emphasizes an urgent need for revising and internationalizing the curriculum of Pharm D and to improve the liaison between the healthcare professionals to meet the demands of the community.
References
2. Franklin BD, van Mil JW. Defining clinical pharmacy and pharmaceutical care. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(3):137. doi:10.1007/s11096-005-7060-4
3. Abu-Gharbieh, Eman & Fahmy, Sahar & Abdul Rasool, Bazigha & Abduelkarem, Abduelmula & Abduelkarem, Abduelmula & Basheti, Iman. (2010). Attitudes and Perceptions of Healthcare Providers and Medical Students Towards Clinical Pharmacy Services in United Arab Emirates. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 9. 421-430. 10.4314/tjpr.v9i5.61050.
4. Basak SC, Sathyanarayana D. Pharmacy education in India. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(4):68. doi:10.5688/aj740468.
5. Garipelly R, Garg S, Mateti UV. Emerging doctor of pharmacy program in India: A survey on general opinion of selected educated Indians. J Res Pharm Pract. 2012;1(2):48-54. doi:10.4103/2279-042X.108370
6. Pharm.D. Regulations 2008. The Gazette of India, No. 19, PART III, SECTION 4. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Pharmacy Council of India) 2008 May;10:1–97. Available from: http://www.pci.nic.in/PDF-Files/PharmD-Revised-A.pdf. [Last cited on 2015].
7. Awalom MT, Kidane ME, Abraha BW. Physicians' views on the professional roles of pharmacists in patient care in Eritrea. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35(5):841-846. doi:10.1007/s11096-013-9820-x
8. Deshpande PR. Should the PharmD degree be the basic educational requirement in India for pharmacists?. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(6):132. doi:10.5688/ajpe776132
9. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-385.
10. Van Winkle LJ, Fjortoft N, Hojat M. Validation of an instrument to measure pharmacy and medical students' attitudes toward physician-pharmacist collaboration. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(9):178. doi:10.5688/ajpe759178
11. Garipelly R, Garg S, Mateti UV. Emerging doctor of pharmacy program in India: A survey on general opinion of selected educated Indians. J Res Pharm Pract. 2012;1(2):48-54. doi:10.4103/2279-042X.108370
12. Ahmad, Akram. (2014). Indian Pharm.D: Should it be pursued?. Archives of Pharmacy Practice. 5. 97-98. 10.4103/2045-080X.132669.
13. Shetty PS. Nutrition transition in India. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(1A):175-182. doi:10.1079/PHN2001291