“A STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ‘REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROMOTING STRATREGIES” ON PREVALENCE REGARDING REPRODUCTIVE MORBIDITIES AMONG WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE GROUP IN SELECTED AREAS OF DISTRICT JALANDHAR, PUNJAB”
Main Article Content
Keywords
Reproductive health promoting strategies, prevalence, reproductive morbidities
Abstract
Background of the study: The prevalence rate of Reproductive Tract infections among women of 15-45 years and men aged 20-54 years,is increasing very fast rate in India as compared to other developed countries.
Aims: Current study had been planned and to be conducted in rural areas of district Jalandhar in a view to evaluate the efficacy of validated health promoting strategies on the prevalence regarding reproductive morbidities among selected group of women.
Settings and Design: A quantitative research approach with nonequivalent pretest -posttest control group research design is used to assess the prevalence of reproductive morbidities among 88 women of aged 18-49 years who were selected through purposive sampling.
Methods and Material: Two sections of the tool divided in to socio demographic variables and structured reproductive morbidity checklist to assess the selected self reported reproductive morbidities among the participants.
Statistical analysis used: Mean, Standard deviations, Chi square test for homogeneity, Anova and t tests were applied to draw the results.
Results: : 52.3% of women were having high prevalence of reproductive morbidities in which highest was found in menstrual disorders(88.6%), followed by reproductive tract infection and UTI(36.4%)respectively. There was a reduction in the post intervention prevalence after the implementation of ‘Reproductive health promoting strategies’
Conclusions: The prevalence of reproductive morbidities was found high among women of reproductive age group. ‘Reproductive health promoting strategies’ were effective in reducing the morbidity rate of selected reproductive disorders.
References
2. Ray K. et.al 2009, ‘Comparative study of syndromic and etiological diagnosis of reproductive tact infections/ STD in women in Delhi’, International Journal of Infectious Diseases,nov, 13(6),Pp.352-9.
3. Marinka vender Hoeven 2008, ‘Differences in health care seeking behavior between rural and urban communities in South Affrica, Bulletin of World Health Organization,80(5):403. [pub Med]
4. Gunjan Rastogi 2012, ‘Health seeking behavior among pregnant women in UP’, Bulletin of World Health Organization.9(2):22-7.
5. Aggarwal A K, Kumar R, Gupta V & Sharma M 1997, ‘Community based study of reproductive tract infections among ever married women of reproductive age in a rural area of Haryana,India,social science and Medicine,51;941-53.[PubMed].
6. Sharma Savita& BPGupta 2009,’ The prevalence of reproductive tract and sexually transmitted diseases among married women at Sirmour’ , Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 34(1) 62-64, doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.45376.
7. Muthu Lakshmi a study on urinary tract infection among females of reproductive age group in a rural area of Kanchipuram District Tamilnadu, International Journal Of Community Medicine and Public Health,4(10) 3915–3921.https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20174274
8. Jaitapal, Shamshad Ahmad and Arohita Shiva 2017 ‘An Interventional study to assess the impact of health education regarding menstrual hygiene on genitor urinary tract morbidities among adolescent girl students in an urban slum of Kolkata’,International Journal of Research in medical Sciences,:5(4)4937-4941.doi:http//dx.doi.org1018203/2320-6012.