Comparison of Hemodynamic and APGAR Score Variables Due to Thiopental Sodium and Propofol as Induction Agent for Cesarean Section
Main Article Content
Keywords
Anesthesia agents, Vital signs, cesarean section, Apgar scores
Abstract
Introduction: A common surgical procedure performed to deliver a baby through incisions in the mother's abdomen and uterus is termed as Cesarean section. Two commonly used anesthetic agents for Cesarean section induction are Thiopental Sodium and Propofol. Hemodynamic variables such as heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and APGAR score which assesses the newborn's condition at birth are affected by choice of anesthetic drug. This study aims to compare the effects of two anesthetic agents, Thiopental Sodium and Propofol, on hemodynamic variables and APGAR score in patients undergoing Cesarean section.
Methods: This is an interventional analytical study. Participants who met the inclusion criteria represented by Group C received Thiopental Sodium and Group D received Propofol. The study was conducted at Alexandria General Hospital in Babylon, Iraq, and collected data using non-invasive blood pressure monitors and pulse oximeters to assess variables such as (MAP), (SAP), (DAP), (HR). (SPO2) and neonatal condition (APGAR score). There is valuable information founded in the study about the effects of these inductive agents on maternal and neonatal outcomes in a relatively healthy population.
Results: In the study comparing different types of anesthesia during cesarean delivery, a total of 88 women were included, with 44 receiving Thiopental Sodium, and 44 receiving Propofol. There were significant differences in baseline Mean, systolic and diastolic arterial pressure, heart rate (HR base), and (APGAR) score between the two groups. The study found that Propofol initially had a higher mean values of (MAP, SAP, DAP) compared to Thiopental Sodium but it was lower at 5,10 minutes after intubation. The statistical analysis confirmed a significant association between the anesthesia agent and the (MAP, SAP, DAP) variable across different time points and anesthesia agents. (HR) and (APGAR) is higher in the propofol group than the Thiopental Sodium group in all time point.
Conclusion: The study concluded that Thiopental Sodium, and Propofol, during cesarean delivery, revealed significant differences in APGAR score, HR, and arterial blood pressure between the two groups. Propofol exhibited the highest baseline mean (MAP, SAP, DAP) in the first two points then it’s lesser than other group. In APGAR and HR variables, propofol exhibited the highest value in all time points. Healthcare professionals should carefully consider these factors when selecting anesthesia to optimize patient outcomes during cesarean delivery.
References
2. Yeoh SB, Leong SB, Heng AS. Anaesthesia for lower-segment caesarean section: Changing perspectives. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2010;54(5):409-14.
3. Keleş E, Yazgan H, Gebeşçe A, Pakır E. The Type of Anesthesia Used during Cesarean Section Is Related to the Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn. ISRN pediatrics. 2013;2013:264340.
4. Ong BY, Cohen MM, Palahniuk RJ. Anesthesia for cesarean section—effects on neonates. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1989 Mar 1;68(3):270-5.
5. Katzung, B. G. (2017). Basic & clinical pharmacology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. Chapter 22: General Anesthetics.
6. Wiener-Kronish JP, Cohen NH, Leslie K, Gropper MA, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, editors.
Miller's anesthesia, 2-volume set E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019 Oct 7.
7. Simon LV, Hashmi MF, Bragg BN. APGAR Score. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2022, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2022.
8. Palme‐Kilander C. Methods of resuscitation in low‐Apgar‐score newborn infants—a national survey. Acta paediatrica. 1992 Oct;81(10):739-44.
9. Folino TB, Muco E, Safadi AO, Parks LJ. Propofol. InStatPearls [Internet] 2022 May 8. StatPearls Publishing.
10. Son Y. Molecular mechanisms of general anesthesia. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2010;59(1):3-8.
11. Wang Y-H, Wang D-R, Liu J-Y, Pan JJJoDS. Local anesthesia in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A of current opinion. 2021;16(4):1055-65.
12. Kotańska M, Kubacka M, Bednarski M, Nicosia N, Szafarz M, Jawień W, et al. The GPR18 agonist PSB-KD-107 exerts endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant effects. 2021;14(8):799.
13. Riznyk L, Fijalkowska M, Przesmycki K. Effects of thiopental and propofol on heart rate variability during fentanyl-based induction of general anesthesia. Pharmacol Rep. 2005 Jan 1;57(1):128-34.
14. Sani MA, Sani D, Khan F, Emmanuel EG, Muhammad ST, Bada AA. Comparative Evaluation of Thiopental Sodium and Ketamine Hydrochloride in the Maintenance of General Anaesthesia during Exploratory Laparotomy in Nigerian Indigenous Dogs. Sahel Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2022 Jun 30;19(2):7-12.
15. Ghomeishi A, Mohtadi AR, Behaeen K, Nesioonpour S, Bakhtiari N, Fahlyani FKJA, et al. Comparison of the Effect of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Parameters and Stress Response Hormones During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery. 2021;11(5); e119446.
16. Sahinovic MM, Struys M, Absalom AR. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2018;57(12):1539-58.
17. Tumukunde J, Lomangisi DD, Davidson O, Kintu A, Joseph E, Kwizera A. Effects of propofol versus thiopental on Apgar scores in newborns and peri-operative outcomes of women undergoing emergency cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. BMC anesthesiology. 2015; 15:63.
18. Gudayu TW. Proportion and factors associated with low fifth minute Apgar score among singleton newborn babies in Gondar University referral hospital; North West Ethiopia. African health sciences. 2017;17(1):1-6.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.