Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Sciatic-Femoral Nerve Block and Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty; A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Main Article Content
Keywords
Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia, Femoral Nerve Block, Sciatic Nerve Block, Total Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: Selective unilateral spinal anaesthesia has many benefits, like early ambulation and more hemodynamic stability. Sciatic-femoral nerve block provides early recovery of the motor, urinary and GIT function, besides prolonged postoperative analgesia. Aim: is to compare an ultrasound-guided combined sciatic–femoral nerve block (USFB) and unilateral spinal anaesthesia (USA) in cases undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods: The study is a randomized, controlled, single-blind prospective study. Ninety patients were included and divided into two equal groups. USFB group received a 30 ml mixture consisting of 7.5 ml of 2.0% lidocaine, 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 7.5 ml of saline (15 ml for the femoral and 15 ml for the sciatic nerve block). USA Group received 2.2 ml (12 mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine.
Results: visual analogue scale (VAS) recordings were significantly lower among the USFB group, compared to the USA group at 4, 8, 12 and 16 hours postoperatively. The duration of the first request of analgesia was significantly longer in the USFB group in comparison to the USA group (347.2 vs 182.63 minutes; P<0.001), respectively. The USA group showed shorter onset and faster sensory and motor block recovery, compared to the USFB group. No significant difference was reported between the two groups regarding the hemodynamic parameters either intra- or post-operatively. No serious complications were noticed in both groups.
Conclusion: Both USA and USFB resulted in comparable adequate intraoperative anaesthesia with stable hemodynamics and minimal side effects. USFB was superior to the USA regarding postoperative analgesia.
References
2. Chandran R, Beh ZY, Tsai FC, Kuruppu SD, Lim JY. Peripheral nerve blocks for above-knee amputation in high-risk patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018;34(4):458-464. doi:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_346_17
3. Davarci I, Tuzcu K, Karcioglu M, et al. Comparison between ultrasound-guided sciatic-femoral nerve block and unilateral spinal anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. J Int Med Res. 2013;41(5):1639-1647. doi:10.1177/0300060513498671
4. Malav K, Singariya G, Mohammed S, Kamal M, Sangwan P, Paliwal B. Comparison of 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine for Sciatic Nerve Block Using Labat Approach in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2018;46(1):15-20. doi:10.5152/TJAR.2017.03411
5. Tallur KP, Sanikop CS, Dhorigol MG. Anesthetic management of post-coronary artery bypass grafting patient posted for below-knee amputation. Journal of the Scientific Society. 2016; 43(2), 89. doi: 10.4103/0974-5009.182606
6. Green L, Machin SJ. Managing anticoagulated patients during neuraxial anaesthesia. Br J Haematol. 2010;149(2):195-208. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08094.x
7. Imbelloni LE, Beato L, Cordeiro JA. Raquianestesia unilateral com baixa dose de bupivacaína a 0,5% hiperbárica [Unilateral spinal anesthesia with low 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine dose.]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2004;54(5):700-706. doi:10.1590/s0034-70942004000500013
8. Moosavi Tekye SM, Alipour M. Comparison of the effects and complications of unilateral spinal anesthesia versus standard spinal anesthesia in lower-limb orthopedic surgery. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014;64(3):173-176. doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2013.06.014
9. Tummala V, Rao LN, Vallury MK, Sanapala A. A comparative study-efficacy and safety of combined spinal epidural anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia in high-risk geriatric patients for surgeries around the hip joint. Anesth Essays Res. 2015;9(2):185-188. doi:10.4103/0259-1162.153764
10. Chohan U, Afshan G, Hoda MQ, Mahmud S. Haemodynamic effects of unilateral spinal anesthesia in high risk patients. J Pak Med Assoc. 2002;52(2):66-69.
11. Akkaya A, Tekelioglu UY, Demirhan A, et al. Ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks combined with sedoanalgesia versus spinal anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014;67(2):90-95. doi:10.4097/kjae.2014.67.2.90
12. Tantry TP, Kadam D, Shetty P, Bhandary S. Combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for lower limb anaesthesia in anticoagulated patients with severe cardiac valvular lesions. Indian J Anaesth. 2010;54(3):235-238. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.65372
13. Fanelli G, Borghi B, Casati A, Bertini L, Montebugnoli M, Torri G. Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Italian Study Group on Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47(8):746-751. doi:10.1007/BF03019476
14. Valanne JV, Korhonen AM, Jokela RM, Ravaska P, Korttila KK. Selective spinal anesthesia: a comparison of hyperbaric bupivacaine 4 mg versus 6 mg for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(6):. doi:10.1097/00000539-200112000-00005
15. Chakravarthy V, Arya VK, Dhillon MS, Chari P. Comparison of regional nerve block to epidural anaesthesia in day care arthroscopic surgery of the knee. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70(6):551-559.
16. Casati A, Cappelleri G, Fanelli G, et al. Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44(5):543-547. doi:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.00509.x
17. Cohen JM, Kolodzie K, Shah S, et al. Preoperative sciatic and femoral nerve blocks for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective analysis. J Anesth Clin Res. 2014; 5(452), 2.
18. Kim JH, Cho MR, Kim SO, Kim JE, Lee DK, Roh WS. A comparison of femoral/sciatic nerve block with a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for total knee replacement arthroplasty. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;62(5):448-453. doi:10.4097/kjae.2012.62.5.448