Association among organizational citizenship behaviour and Psychological well-being: Mediating effet of Emotioal Intelligence: An empirical study concerning Information Technology employees
Main Article Content
Keywords
Organizational citizenship behaviour, Emotional Intelligence, Psychological well-being, Cronbach’s alpha, Model-fit indices
Abstract
This paper presents the structural equation modeling results on the Association among organizational citizenship behaviour and Psychological well-being: Mediating effet of Emotioal Intelligence: An empirical study concerning Information Technology employees in and around Hyderabad, an Indian Metr. The influence of the three construct of Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and with three sub-scales – consciousness, civic virtue, and altruism; the construct Emotional Intelligence with three sub-scales – self-awareness, empathy and managing emotions; on the psychological well-being construct with four sub-scales of psychological well-being – autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth and self-acceptance were measured. The reliability of the the survey instrument, the questionnaire was estimated measuring the Cronbach’s alpha regliability statistic which ranged from 0.795 to 0.910 indicating reliability and internal consistency. The model fit indicates indicate good-fir of the model. The structural equation model results reveal that organizational citizenship behaviour and emotional intelligence has statistically significant (p<0.001) influence on psychological well-being of information technology enabled employees. Further, emotional intelligence has a mediating effect among organizational citizenship behaviour and psychological well-being of the information technology employees. The appropriate emotional intelligence and organizational citizenship behaviour enhances the employee performance. The results presented in the manuscript.
References
2. Afsar, B., & Badir, Y. F. (2016). Person–organization fit, perceived organizational support, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of job embeddedness. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 15(3), 252-278.
3. Aggarwal, R., & Bhatnagar, J. (2017). Job Characteristics and Organizational Citizenship Behavior among IT Employees: A Study in India. Global Business Review, 18(1), 191-206.4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
5. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
6. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
7. Dhawan, S., & Singh, R. (2018). Organizational citizenship behavior and psychological well-being among IT professionals in India. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 541-546.
8. Dhiman, A., & Jain, P. (2019). Psychological capital, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior among IT employees in India. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 94-98.
9. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social indicators research, 97, 143-156.
10. Dwivedi, R., & Singh, R. (2019). The role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between psychological well-being and organizational citizenship behavior among IT employees. Indian Journal of Health and Well-being, 10(3), 294-297.
11. Jehanzeb, K., & Mohanty, J. (2020). The mediating role of organizational commitment between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: Power distance as moderator. Personnel Review, 49(2), 445-468.
12. Kumar, M. M., & Shah, S. A. (2015). Psychometric properties of Podsakoff’s organizational citizenship behaviour scale in the Asian context. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(1), 51-60.
13. Kumar, P., & Sharma, V. (2018). The Role of Perceived Organizational Support in Predicting Organizational Citizenship Behavior among IT Employees. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 53(3), 448-462.
14. Kumar, P., & Sharma, V. (2019). Antecedents and Outcomes of Organizational Citizenship Behavior among IT Professionals in India: The Moderating Role of Psychological Capital. Journal of Human Values, 25(1), 45-59.
15. Massoudi, A. H., Jameel, A. S., & Ahmad, A. R. (2020). Stimulating organizational citizenship behavior by applying organizational commitment and satisfaction. International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review, 2(2), 20-27.
16. Mishra, S., Sahu, S., & Singh, A. K. (2016). Job Stress and Psychological Well-being: A Study among Indian IT Professionals. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(2), 224-231.
17. Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior?. Academy of Management journal, 41(3), 351-357.
18. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington books/DC heath and com.
19. Pandey, A., Jha, R. K., & Misra, N. (2019). Occupational Stress, Work-Family Conflict, and Psychological Well-being among Indian IT Professionals. Indian Journal of Health and Well-being, 10(10), 1534-1538.
20. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563.
21. Prasad KDV, Vaidya R and Rani R (2023) Remote working and occupational stress: Effects on IT-enabled industry employees in Hyderabad Metro, India. Front. Psychol. 14:1069402. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1069402
22. Prasad, KDV, Mruthyanjaya Rao, M., Vaidya, W. R., & Muralidhar, B. (2020). Organizational climate, opportunities, challenges and psychological well-being of the remote working employees during COVID-19 pandemic: A general linear model approach with reference to information technology industry in Hyderabad. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), 11(4).
23. ProQuest (2018). Understanding psychological capital and subjective well-being at workplace - ProQuest. (2018b, September). ProQuest.
24. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(4), 719.
25. Shin, Y., Kim, M. S., Choi, J. N., Kim, M., & Oh, W. K. (2017). Does leader-follower regulatory fit matter? The role of regulatory fit in followers’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1211-1233.
26. Singh, A. K., & Singh, A. P. (2010). Role of stress and organizational support in predicting organizational citizenship behavior. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(4).
27. Singh, P., & Srivastava, S. (2019). Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Psychological Well-being among Indian IT Employees. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 23(2), 66-70.
28. Singh, R., & Singh, S. (2019). Psychological well-being and job performance among Indian IT employees. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 54-58.
29. Sischka, P. E. (2022b, July 14). COVID-19 countermeasures at the workplace, psychological well-being, and mental health - a nationally representative latent class analysis of Luxembourgish employees.
30. Werneburg, B. L., Jenkins, S. M., Friend, J. L., Berkland, B. E., Clark, M. M., Rosedahl, J. K., & Sood, A. (2018). Improving resiliency in healthcare employees. American journal of health behavior, 42(1), 39-50.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.