Microbial Analysis of Plaque Biofilm In Subjects Undergoing Orthodontic Treatment With Different Bracket Systems

Main Article Content

Niharika Bhatia
Ravindra Kumar Jain
Smiline Girija

Keywords

Orthodontics ; biofilm; plaque biofilm; bracket

Abstract

Objectives: To identify microorganisms isolated from patients wearing different types of fixed orthodontic appliances and evaluate the resistance of isolated bacterial strains to different antimicrobials.
Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients indicated to undergo fixed orthodontic treatment were chosen for the study and were divided into 3 groups -7 patients in group 1 ( conventional metal brackets), 6 patients in group 2 (conventional ceramic brackets), and 6 patients in group 3 (Passive self-ligating metal system). Plaque biofilm formed around orthodontic brackets was collected, samples were plated onto brain heart infusion agar and mitis salivarius agar and were incubated. Similarly, samples were collected in blood broth and were streaked onto blood agar to evaluate the anaerobic colony counts. Results: Maximum aerobic and anaerobic bacterial count was seen in group 2 and least in group 3. Most prevalent microbial genera were streptococcus mutans showing predominantly sensitive strains with one strain from Group 3 which showed resistance against amikacin, cefazolin, cefixime, and cefazolin.
Conclusions: The number of aerobic and anaerobic CFU/ml is higher on the surface of ceramic brackets when compared to the conventional metal or the Passive self-ligating system. Streptococcus mutans was most prevalent bacterial strain amongst all aerobic bacteria isolated from all three groups.

Abstract 175 | PDF Downloads 183

References

1. Anhoury P, Nathanson D, Hughes CV, Socransky S, Feres M, Chou LL. Microbial profile on metallic and ceramic bracket materials. Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):338–43.
2. Alexander SA. Effects of orthodontic attachments on the gingival health of permanent second molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Oct;100(4):337–40.
3. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Apr;15(2):167–93.
4. Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA. Microbial attachment on orthodontic appliances: I. Wettability and early pellicle formation on bracket materials [Internet]. Vol. 108, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995. p. 351–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70032-3
5. Müller LK, Jungbauer G, Jungbauer R, Wolf M, Deschner J. Biofilm and Orthodontic Therapy. In: Oral Biofilms. Karger Publishers; 2021. p. 201–13.
6. Dittmer MP, Hellemann CF, Grade S, Heuer W, Stiesch M, Schwestka-Polly R, et al. Comparative three-dimensional analysis of initial biofilm formation on three orthodontic bracket materials. Head Face Med. 2015 Apr 10;11:10.
7. Stewart PS, William Costerton J. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001 Jul 14;358(9276):135–8.
8. Pellissari BA, Sabino GSP, de Souza Lima RN, Motta RHL, Suzuki SS, Garcez AS, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial strains in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with and without fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2021 Sep 1;91(5):672–9.
9. Pandis N, Vlachopoulos K, Polychronopoulou A, Madianos P, Eliades T. Periodontal condition of the mandibular anterior dentition in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets [Internet]. Vol. 11, Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2008. p. 211–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00432.x
10. Marsh PD. Microbiology of Dental Plaque Biofilms and Their Role in Oral Health and Caries [Internet]. Vol. 54, Dental Clinics of North America. 2010. p. 441–54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.002
11. van Gastel J, Quirynen M, Teughels W, Coucke W, Carels C. Influence of bracket design on microbial and periodontal parameters in vivo. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 May;34(5):423–31.
12. Harradine N. The History and Development of Self-Ligating Brackets. Semin Orthod. 2008 Mar 1;14(1):5–18.
13. Garcez AS, Suzuki SS, Ribeiro MS, Mada EY, Freitas AZ, Suzuki H. Biofilm retention by 3 methods of ligation on orthodontic brackets: A microbiologic and optical coherence tomographyanalysis [Internet]. Vol. 140, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2011. p. e193–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.019
14. Baka ZM, Basciftci FA, Arslan U. Effects of 2 bracket and ligation types on plaque retention: a quantitative microbiologic analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):260–7.
15. Lindel ID, Elter C, Heuer W, Heidenblut T, Stiesch M, Schwestka-Polly R, et al. Comparative analysis of long-term biofilm formation on metal and ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):907–14.
16. Komori R, Sato T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Takahashi N. Microbial composition of dental plaque microflora on first molars with orthodontic bands and brackets, and the acidogenic potential of these bacteria [Internet]. Vol. 54, Journal of Oral Biosciences. 2012. p. 107–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.job.2012.01.009
17. Germano F, Bramanti E, Arcuri C, Cecchetti F, Cicciù M. Atomic force microscopy of bacteria from periodontal subgingival biofilm: Preliminary study results. Eur J Dent. 2013 Apr;7(2):152–8.
18. Sunil PC, Michael T, Raju AS, Paul RK, Mamatha J, Ebin TM. Evaluation of Micro-organism in Ligated Metal and Self-ligating Brackets using Scanning Electron Microscopy: An In Vivo Study. Journal of international oral health : JIOH [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2023 Jan 9];7(7). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26229372/
19. Fernandes RB, Polo AB, Rocha VN, Vitral RWF, Apolônio ACM, da Silva Campos MJ. Influence of orthodontic brackets design and surface properties on the cariogenic Streptococcus mutans adhesion [Internet]. Vol. 34, The Saudi Dental Journal. 2022. p. 321–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.03.008
20. Hafiz KAA, Fysal N, Jose S, Kulshrestha R, Arora D, Vasudevan S. Antibiogram Pattern of Oral Microflora in Periodontic Children of Age Group 6 to 12 Years: A Clinicomicrobiological Study [Internet]. Vol. 14, The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2013. p. 595–600. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1370