Original Research
Iffat Jahan1, Momtaz Begum2, Shahin Akhter2, Md. Zakirul Islam3, Nusrat Jahan4 and Mainul Haque5
1Department of Physiology, Southern Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh
2Department of Physiology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh
3Department of Pharmacology, Eastern Medical College, Cumilla, Bangladesh
4Department of Internal Medicine, United Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
5Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Alternate nostril breathing (ANB) is one of the best and easiest breathing exercises (pranayama) of yoga that are good for health and physical fitness. ANB exercise has beneficial and therapeutic effects on respiratory function in both normal as well as diseased humans. This study was conducted with the objective of assessing the physiological effects of short-term ANB exercise on respiratory function in healthy adult individuals leading a stressful life. This prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, Chittagong Medical College (CMC), Chattogram, Bangladesh from July 2017 to June 2018. A total of 100 participants aged 18–20 years, studying in the first year in CMC, were included by using a simple random sampling method. Among them, 50 participants were enrolled in the experimental group. Age- and BMI-matched 50 participants constituted the control group. Height, weight were measured, and BMI was calculated. The participants of the experimental group performed ANB exercise over 4 weeks for 10 min/day. The control participants were neither trained nor allowed to practice nostril breathing during the whole study period. Respiratory parameters like forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were measured by using a digital spirometer (Chest graph HI-101, Japan). Readings were taken in a healthy upright sitting posture in the control and experimental group initially and after 4 weeks. Student’s t-test was conducted by using SPSS for windows version-23. The mean value of FVC, FEV1, PEFR were significantly (P < 0.001) changed after the ANB exercise when compared to the values before breathing exercise. The results of this study suggest that respiratory function is significantly improved after the ANB exercise. Therefore, ANB can be recommended for increasing respiratory efficiency.
Keywords: alternate nostril, nose, breathing exercise, yoga, pranayama, respiratory function, healthy young adults
Good health is the greatest asset of human life.1 Proper diet, adequate exercise, and a stress-free life are essential to maintain good health.1 Rapid industrialization, environmental pollution, overcrowding, and sedentary lifestyles are responsible for the deterioration of the health of a person.2 WHO predicts that physical or mental stress will become the second leading cause of disability and cardio-respiratory disease morbidity by the year 2020.3 Atmospheric pollution is responsible for various types of respiratory diseases.1 Dust allergy, common cold with cough, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchial asthma, status asthmaticus are common diseases nowadays especially in city areas.1 In Bangladesh, approximately 11.4% of COPD is prevalent in the urban population comprising people aged over 35 years and 6.8% of this population suffers from bronchial asthma in coastal region.4,5 Physical health, mental health, and fitness depend mainly on respiratory endurance.6 Some specific techniques are required to improve our physical and mental abilities in everyday life.2 Preventive, curative, and promotive health in medical science is quite useful to achieve optimum physical and psychological fitness.7 Among all the autonomic functions of our body, the breathing function can be consciously controlled.8 Consciously controlled breathing or pranayama is widely admired as a promising technique.9 It enhances the mental and physical power of the human body.9 It also provides oxygen and expires out carbon-di-oxide and other unwanted toxic gaseous substances from the body.9 Controlled breathing can help to bring the sympathetic and parasympathetic functions into a harmonic state.8 Breathing exercises (Pranayama) like alternate nostril breathing (ANB) are gaining importance and becoming increasingly accepted in Western society.10,11 In previous studies, it was found that ANB modulated sympathovagal balance with improved respiratory function.8,9,12,13 It also relieved stress 14–16 and refined metabolism.17–23 It also increased cognitive function 14,24–26 and attenuation of healthy aging.27,28 Among different types of breathing exercises (pranayama), ANB is one of the best and easiest breathing exercises.9 It is cost-effective and does not require any special equipment or time investment.9 It completely purifies the body as well as mind.2,9 It also promotes health and fitness.2,9 ANB produces consistent positive physiological changes and has a sound scientific basis for its beneficial outcomes in the human body.6 While doing the ANB exercise, slow inhalation followed by slow exhalation of air through one nostril is practiced keeping the alternate nose closed with a short interval of breath-holding in between breathing and exhalation.29 Different studies observed beneficial effects of breathing exercise on diseased as well as normal healthy subjects.7,18,30–35 In a study, an 18% improvement of O2 consumption was observed after 1 month of doing the ANB exercise.17 Significantly increased VO2 max (maximal oxygen uptake) and basal metabolic rate were noted after completion of the deep breathing exercise in healthy participants and medical students.6,18 Medical students lead a stressful study life as stated in different studies.12,35 The burden of the medical curriculum imposes extreme study stress on the medical student.12,35 Continuous mental-pressure can lead to irritability, insomnia, anxiety, and depression.12 Mental stress can change the set point of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis leading to sympathovagal imbalance.8 It may cause immediate harmful effects on the respiratory rate, and thus, respiratory diseases may set in.8 Respiratory muscles undergo work hypertrophy with maximum functioning during breathing exercises like ANB.7,36 A significant improvement was noted for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1st sec (FEV1), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), expiratory reserve volume (ERV) among healthy young subjects and also on healthy medical students.7,13,31,34 The increase in MEP and MIP in the yoga group indicates that yoga improves the strength of both expiratory and inspiratory muscles.33 This study was conducted with the aim to assess the physiological effects of short-term ANB exercise on respiratory function in healthy adult individuals under stressful conditions.
This research was an experimental study that was conducted in the Department of Physiology, CMC, Chattogram, Bangladesh, under continuous supervision and monitoring during the period from July 2017 to June 2018.
A total of 100 participants were recruited in this study, 50 in each of the control and experimental group.
Simple random sampling by lottery method was adopted as the method to select all the subjects.
The study was conducted over a period from July 2017 to June 2018.
Department of Physiology, CMC, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
The first-year students aged between 18 and 20 years having BMI 18.5–22.9 kg/m2 and studying in CMC, Chattogram, fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study with informed consent. Detailed personal information, medical and family history, and the history of physical activity status was recorded in a pre-fixed questionnaire given to all the participants who participated voluntarily. Participants who previously did not perform breathing exercises were randomly selected.
Students with previous history of cardiovascular, respiratory illness, having any nasal pathology, smokers, participants receiving respiratory depressant drugs, and vertebral deformities are excluded from the study.
Age, height, body weight, and BMI of the participants were recorded in a predesigned case record form. Respiratory parameters (FVC, FEV1, and PEFR) of students were registered in upright sitting posture before commencing breathing exercises to see the baseline parameters in the both control and experimental groups by using a digital spirometer (Chest graph, HI-101, Japan). The readings of measured predicted, and percentage of predicted values of FVC, FEV1, and PEFR were noted from the spirometer monitor. Three consecutive readings were taken, and the best value was noted on tracing paper. Control group participants were neither trained nor allowed to practice in ANB exercises and experimental group participants were taught the detailed steps of ANB with audio-visual demonstration and they practiced ANB daily for 10 min during the college period for 4 weeks (Figure 1).
FIG 1. Steps of Alternate Nostril Breathing Exercise (ANB) (a) The subjects were asked to close the left nostril with the thumb of the left hand and inhale through the right nostril for 6 sec. (b) Then they closed the right nostril by using the index finger and held their breath for 6 sec. (c) After that they exhaled through the left nostril slowly for 6 sec. (d) Then they inhaled through the left nostril, keeping the right nostril closed for 6 sec. (e) Then the Subjects hold their breath, closing both nostrils for 6 sec. (f) Then they exhaled through the right nostril, keeping the left closed for 6 sec.37
After 4 weeks, respiratory parameters were again measured for both the control and experimental group.
Detailed personal information, medical and family history, and the history of physical activity status were recorded in a pre-fixed questionnaire given to all the participants who participated voluntarily.
All the data were compiled and processed after collection. Results were expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation) and range. FVC, FEV1 and PEFR data were analyzed by Student’s t-test using SPSS-23. For statistical analysis, a paired-sample t-test was used to compare respiratory parameters at the beginning and the end of the study in control (without ANB exercise) and experimental groups (with ANB exercise) and unpaired t-test was used to compare between control (without ANB exercise) and experimental groups (with ANB exercise) at the beginning and the end of the study. Ninety-five percent confidence limit was taken as a minimum level of significance. In the interpretation of results, P < 0.05 was accepted as the level of significance.
The protocol of this study was approved by the members of the Ethical Review Board of CMC, Chattogram, Bangladesh, and received a certificate of ethical clearance of ERB [Reference No.: CMC/PG/2018/403. Dated 10/5/2018].
In this study, all experimental participants were healthy controls based on age, height, weight, and BMI. In this study, at baseline, FVC, FEV1, and PEFR values the between control and experimental group at the beginning of the study showed no significant difference (Table 1). Again, the significant increment was observed in all these parameters between the control and experimental group at the end of the study (Table 1). After 4 weeks of follow-up, an experimental group with ANB exercise had significantly increased FVC, FEV1, and PEFR values (P < 0.001) when compared to their baseline values, whereas after 4 weeks without ANB in the control group all these parameters showed no significant changes (Table 2; Figures 2 and 3).
Respiratory Attributes | FVC (Liter) Mean ± SD (Range) | FEV1 (Liter) Mean ± SD (Range) | PEFR (Liter/sec) Mean ± SD (Range) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
At the beginning of study | Control group (n = 50) | 2.96±0.572 | 2.87±0.550 | 6.54±1.237 |
(2.08–4.19) | (2.08–3.99) | (5.05–10.70) | ||
Experimental group (n = 50) | 2.88±0.630 | 2.80±0.574 | 6.43±1.361 | |
(2.05–4.35) | (2.05–4.31) | (4.88–9.92) | ||
P value | 0.590ns | 0.595ns | 0.685ns | |
(t value) | (0.542) | (0.535) | (0.409) | |
At the end of study | Control group (n = 50) | 3.00±0.551 | 2.90±0.522 | 6.37±1.291 |
(2.04–3.95) | (2.04–3.92) | (5.23–10.43) | ||
Experimental group (n = 50) | 3.20±0.675 | 3.05±0.554 | 7.20±1.612 | |
(2.11–4.53) | (2.02–4.44) | (4.96–11.84) | ||
P value | <0.05* | <0.05* | <0.05* | |
(t value) | (2.019) | (2.043) | (2.541) | |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Figures in parenthesis indicate range, statistical analysis conducted by using Student’s unpaired t-test, ns = not significant * = statistically significant test (P < 0.05). ANB, alternate nostril breathing; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1st second; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate. |
Respiratory | Attributes | FVC (Liter) Mean ± SD (Range) | FEV1 (Liter) Mean ± SD (Range) | PEFR (Liter/sec) Mean ± SD (Range) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control group (n = 50) | At the beginning of study | 2.96±0.572 | 2.87±0.550 | 6.54±1.237 |
(2.08–4.19) | (2.08–3.99) | (5.05–10.70) | ||
At the end of study | 3.00±0.551 | 2.90±0.522 | 6.37±1.291 | |
(2.04–3.95) | (2.04–3.92) | (5.23–10.43) | ||
P value | 0.537ns | 0.683ns | 0.336ns | |
(t value) | (0.621) | (0.411) | (0.971) | |
Experimental group (n = 50) | At the beginning of study | 2.88±0.630 | 2.80±0.574 | 6.43±1.361 |
(2.05–4.31) | (2.05–4.31) | (4.88–9.92) | ||
At the end of study | 3.20±0.675 | 3.05±0.554 | 7.20±1.612 | |
(2.11–4.53) | (2.02–4.44) | (4.96–11.84) | ||
P value | <0.001** | <0.001** | <0.001** | |
(t value) | (8.066) | (6.798) | (4.090) | |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Figures in parenthesis indicate range, statistical analysis conducted by Student’s paired t-test. ns = not significant (P > 0.05) ** = statistically significant test (P < 0.001). ANB, alternate nostril breathing; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1st second; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate. |
FIG 2. Respiratory Parameters in the Control Group (without ANB Exercise) at the Beginning and End of the Study.
FIG 3. Respiratory Parameters in the Experimental Group (with ANB Exercise) at the Beginning and End of the Study.
This study assessed respiratory functions in the experimental group before and after ANB exercise for 4 weeks by analysis of FVC, FEV1, and PEFR values and compared these results with the control. In this study, for the control group, not practicing breathing exercises, the baseline values and the FVC, FEV1, and PEFR values after 1 month did not show any significant change. This finding is consistent with some previous studies conducted by Bal,9 Chanarivut et al.38 and Madanmohan et al.39 They also did not find any significant change in respiratory parameters in their studies.
In the experimental group that practiced ANB exercise for 1 month, mean FVC, FEV1, and PEFR were significantly increased from their baseline values. These findings are similar to those from some previous studies conducted by Biswas,2 Yadav and Das,7 Bal,9 and some other researchers.11,13,33–36,39,40–53 They supposed that FVC might be increased due to the strengthening of respiratory muscles by regular practicing of breathing exercises.2,42,44,45 FEV1 might be increased due to the removal of secretions from the bronchial tree, which made room in alveoli for more air after the breathing exercise.49 According to Raghavendra et al. yogic breathing involves isometric contraction and expansion of abdominal and intercostal muscles that may also improve the strength of intercostal muscles which lead to increased FVC and FEV1.54 Increased PEFR was supposed to be due to greater involvement of lung alveoli during the breathing exercise, which were dormant before the workout.41,50,55 According to Joshi et al.42 and Ankad et al.,51 PEFR were supposed to increase by increased release of lung surfactant and prostaglandins which reflexively relax the smooth muscle of the larynx and tracheobronchial tree. This modulates the caliber of the airways and reduces airway resistance which were the causal factors for increased PEFR in their study. According to Karmur et al.,11 Dhungel et al.,43 and Shrivastava et al.,56 increment in thoracopulmonary compliance and bronchodilatation by breathing exercise might be responsible for increased PEFR in their studies.57 In this study, improved respiratory functions after following the exercise for 1 month might be due to the above-mentioned causes.
Some investigators found only marginal improvement in FVC and FEV1 after pranayama training, which was dissimilar to this study.58,59 They explained that this might be due to a short period of research over which studies were conducted on normal healthy subjects.58,59 Alternate nostril breathing exercise brought significant improvement in respiratory parameters (FVC, FEV1, PEFR) in the experimental group of medical students.2,6 Therefore, ANB is very much helpful for the improvement of respiratory function as well as the prevention of different complications of respiratory problems.57 The limitation of this research was the fact that the study was conducted for both academic and clinical purposes over a short period of time. Although optimal care had been taken by the researcher in every step of the study, but there were some limitations: (1) short period of study, (2) small sample size that might not represent the whole community, (3) study was conducted with a limited age group, (4) the study was conducted on medical students of the first year only, (5) socio-demographic study could not be conducted, (f) proper sitting posture in the floor on the mat was not maintained, and (6) measurement of catecholamine level in blood and urinary excretion was not done to see the stress pattern.
In the present study, yoga-based ANB exercise done for a period of 1 month brought significant improvement in respiratory parameters (FVC, FEV1, and PEFR) in the study subjects. Though it was difficult to comment about the exact mechanism involved here, probably, it was due to shifting of sympathovagal balance towards parasympathetic predominance. Therefore, this study concludes that practicing ANB exercises can be a useful measure for the improvement of respiratory endurance and functions. This may help in preventing different complications of pulmonary problems in the future.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This study received no financial support.
The authors acknowledge the support of the Department of Physiology, CMC, Chattogram during sample collection and laboratory instrument uses. The authors are also thankful to the study subjects for their active, sincere, and voluntary participation.
The data will be available only for research purpose.
This study was approved by the Chittagong Medical College, Institutional Review Board, Bandladesh.